Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
United States v. McGee, ACM S32605 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32605 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Demetrius E. MCGEE Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 12 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Thomas J. Alford. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 45 days, re- duction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 4 June 2019 by SpCM convened at McConnell Air Force Base, Kansas. For Appellant: Major...

# 1
United States v. Hatcher, ACM S32588 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32588 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Ryan D. HATCHER Airman Basic (E-1), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 24 October 2019 _ Military Judge: Andrew R. Norton. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for four months, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 11 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Hurlburt Field, Florida. For Appellant: Major Patrick J. Hughes, USAF. For...

# 2
United States v. Ortega, ACM S32587 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32587 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tevin W. ORTEGA Staff Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 12 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Joseph S. Imburgia. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 4 months, reduction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 1 February 2019 by SpCM convened at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, Japan. For Appellant: Major...

# 3
United States v. Erdmann, ACM S32578 (2019)

Sentence adjudged 8 January 2019 by SpCM convened at Ellsworth, Air Force Base, South Dakota., 2 We note that the court-martial order (CMO) is not dated the same date as the con-, vening authoritys action. See R.C.M. United States v. Miller, No. ACM, S32433, 2018 CCA LEXIS 207, at *10–11 (A.F.

# 4
United States v. Ramirez Jr., ACM S32576 (2019)

Sentence adjudged 18 December, 2018 by SpCM convened at Barksdale Air Force Base, Louisiana., For Appellant: Major Jarett F. Merk, USAF; 1, For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire. Grossman was at all times supervised by an attorney admitted to practice before, this court.

# 5
United States v. Taylor, ACM S32574 (2019)

Rebecca E. Schmidt. Upon our review, we noted two errors: (1) a scriveners error on the, charge sheet in which the Appellant pleaded and was found guilty of using, marijuana on or about 31 September 2018 (emphasis added);) are found in the Manual for Courts-Martial, United, States (2016 ed.).

# 6
United States v. Lanier, ACM S32572 (2019)

Military Judge: Matthew D. Talcott., For Appellant: Major Kirk W. Albertson, USAF.* We note two errors in the promulgating order. Additionally, the order omits that a, military judge adjudged the sentence on 20 December 2018. See Rule for Courts-Mar-, tial 1114(c)(2) (2016);

# 7
United States v. Freeman III, ACM S32564 (2019)

Military Judge: Matthew D. Talcott, Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 40 days, for-, feiture of $1, 287.00 pay per month for 1 month, reduction to E-1, and a, reprimand. We reduce the adjudged, forfeiture in our decretal paragraph. Rule for Courts-Martial, (R.C.M.

# 8
United States v. Sylvia, ACM S32562 (2019)

Military Judge: W. Shane Cohen. Sentence adjudged 29 August 2018 by SpCM con-, vened at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia., For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Garrett M. Condon, USAF., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF.Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

# 9
United States v. Caldwell, ACM S32561 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32561 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Emmanuel J. CALDWELL Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 10 December 2019 _ Military Judge: Thomas J. Alford. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 21 days, re- duction to E-1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 6 November 2018 by SpCM convened at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota. For...

# 10
United States v. Connors, ACM S32557 (2019)

leaving these details to the Service Secretaries and discretion of trial counsel., Because Appellant has failed to demonstrate his deployment warranted, inclusion on his PDS under the criteria specified in AFI 51–201, he has failed, to identify any error regarding the PDS.

# 11
United States v. DeClue, ACM S32555 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE, C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS, ________________________ Articles, United States v. DeClue, No. ACM S32555 , 2 We note the Court-Martial Order (CMO) dated 30 November 2018 states that Speci-, fication 3 of the Charge was withdrawn and dismissed after arraignment.

# 12
United States v. Jackson, ACM S32553 (2019)

The sentence reads: [i]f a victim, statement, submitted under R.C.M.we will assume arguendo that obvious error existed when the 16 November, 2018 addendum to the SJAR, with A1C THs letter attached, was never served, on Appellant and his defense counsel. Clemency, was due 10 November 2018.

# 13
United States v. Kilduff, ACM S32548 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32548 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Jaime L. KILDUFF Senior Airman (E-4), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 12 November 2019 _ Military Judge: Christopher M. Schumann. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 82 days, reduction to E- 1, and a reprimand. Sentence adjudged 28 August 2018 by SpCM convened at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. For Appellant: Major...

# 14
United States v. Winn de Leon, ACM S32544 (2019)

United States v. Zimmer, 56 M.J. Appellants, trial defense counsel did point out to the CA how long it had taken to get to, that point, specifically indicating that the Moreno standard for taking action, was less than a week away, and requested that the forfeitures be disapproved, as a result.

# 15
United States v. Faughn, ACM S32542 (2019)

U NITED S TATES AIR F ORCE C OURT OF C RIMINAL APPEALS _ No. ACM S32542 _ UNITED STATES Appellee v. Tommy L. FAUGHN Airman First Class (E-3), U.S. Air Force, Appellant _ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 26 November 2019 _ Military Judge: Michael D. Schag. Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 120 days, reduction to the grade of E-1, and forfeiture of $1,092.00 pay per month for 5 months. Sentence adjudged 29 June 2018 by SpCM con- vened at...

# 16
United States v. Balido, ACM S32541 (2019)

Military Judge: Andrew Kalavanos.1On 25 June 2018, the same date as the announcement of sentence, Appellant executed, an Air Force Form 304, Request for Appellate Defense Counsel (May 2000) (AF Form, 304), electing not to request appellate defense counsel to represent him before this, court.

# 17
United States v. Leverenz, ACM S32539 (2019)

Military Judge: Shelly W. Schools, Approved sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, and reduction to E-1. Sen-, tence adjudged 24 April 2018 by SpCM convened at Cannon Air Force, Base, New Mexico., For Appellant: Major Mark J. Schwartz, USAF., For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Joseph J. Kubler, USAF;

# 18
United States v. Hernandez, ACM S32535 (2019)

, For Appellant: Major Rebecca J. Otey, USAF;PER CURIAM:, The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no er-, ror materially prejudicial to Appellants substantial rights occurred. We direct the publi-, cation of a corrected court-martial order to remedy these errors.

# 19
United States v. Rodgers, ACM S32533 (2019)

DISCUSSION, It is clear from the record that the military judge did not intend to acquit, Appellant of the excepted language when he announced his finding of guilt by, exceptions as to Specification 3, in accordance with Appellants pleas and her, agreement with the convening authority.

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer