The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More, No. Z-324.[1] The trial court rejected the claim of all appellants that a deficiency judgment was in the circumstances inequitable, and rejected the individuals' claim they were discharged by the extension at increased interest to which, they say, they did not consent.
2d 115 (1977), PRICE WISE BUYING GROUP et al., District Court of Appeal, State of Florida, First District., The Declaratory Statement is a rule as defined by Section 120.52(14) because it is an agency statement of general applicability that implements, interprets and prescribes law or policy.
The trial court should award the use and occupancy of the home to Mrs. Singer and the minor children as long as Mrs. Singer remains unmarried and until the youngest of the children reaches majority, or the children die, or they marry, or they are no longer dependent. Maroun v. Maroun, 277 So.
557 F.2d 343, Fed. Appellants argued that although Waldman knew of the sharp rise in past due accounts receivable and Topper's faltering sales, he failed to disclose the information in violation of the securities laws and his fiduciary duty under the Citibank-Pension Fund investment contract.
564 F.2d 87, U. S.v.One 1974 Datsun 260Z VIN RLS 30013267, No. 77-1154, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 8/30/77, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
Petitioner raised the issue of double jeopardy in a petition for habeas corpus before the federal district court, and subsequently in an application for certificate of probable cause before this court. 653, 5 L. Ed. 2d 670 (1961);, 9, This case differs from Benton in several significant respects.
552 F.2d 20, Francis G. SCOTT, Petitioner, v.Richard M. OLIVER, Warden, et al., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. State v. Scott, Me. Nor did defendant object when the state called Dr. Jacobsohn., 6, Here also, defendant made no objection at trial. United States v. Albright, 4 Cir.
573 F.2d 1295, Sollowayv.First Indiana Corp., No. 77-7230, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 12/23/77, 1, S.D.N.Y., AFFIRMED
573 F.2d 1290, 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 48, Gautamv.First National City Bank (Citybank), No. 77-7064, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 10/3/77, S.D.N.Y., 425 F. Supp. 579, AFFIRMED
564 F.2d 677, In the Matter of FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH, INC., etc., et al., 10, The court having permitted the foreclosure sale to proceed in state court, the question is whether notice to creditors of the state foreclosure sale was mandated by federal law pertaining to corporate reorganizations.
566 F.2d 1167, 83 Lab.Cas. P 10, 367, N. L. R. B.v.United Printing, Inc., No. 77-1543, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 12/28/77, 1, N.L.R.B., JUDGMENT OF ENFORCEMENt
566 F.2d 1167, Rhodesv.Wilkinson, No. 77-1509, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 12/16/77, 1, D.R.I., AFFIRMED
566 F.2d 1166, Gaskinsv.Commonwealth of Massachusetts, No. 77-1411, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 10/7/77, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
the work of the Special Grand Jury . The court noted that the district court had recited that the United States Attorney had verified in writing that the exigencies of public service required the empanelling of an additional grand jury for the disposal of Government business, 510 F.2d at 320.
United States fishermen as well as consumers benefit from international cooperation. Wallace stated that, in considering at what level to set the optimum yield figure for this stock, he took into account the traditional fishing activities of foreign fleets in the Georges Bank herring fishery;
Secretary. In order further to protect domestic workers and their working conditions, as required by subsection (14)(B), employers of both domestic and alien workers are obliged to maintain certain minimum wage and other standards determined by the U.S. Secretary, hereinafter U.S. conditions.
In any event, after hearing, the ALJ held that he did not credit Keating's testimony when it conflicted with that of Stennes, and went on explicitly to reject the employer's contention that Stennes had been given merely temporary employment in the spring to work on what are known as winter graves.
566 F.2d 1167, Slotnickv.Bureau of Internal Revenue, No. 77-1341, United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit, 12/20/77, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
566 F.2d 360, John T. MARTIN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.Rudolph H. DeSILVA et al., Defendants, Appellees., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. This process is to be distinguished from a pen register device which records the numbers dialled from a targeted phone.
, 3, Before enactment of the Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the Georges Bank fishery had been managed by the International Commission for the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries (ICNAF), an international organization from which the United States withdrew at the end of 1976. from the stock.
