The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
More, United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nuclear Assurance Corp. v. Dames Moore, supra, 225 S.E.2d at 98.1, 5, Plaintiff contends, however, that the parties intended to be bound by the terms of the letter agreement and that the intent of the parties raises a disputed issue of fact.
665 F.2d 1044, First American National Bank of Nashvillev.Corum, 80-3536, 81-5410, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Sixth Circuit, 9/15/81, 1, W.D.Ky., REMANDED
681 F.2d 802, 111 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2058, N. L. R. B.v.First Nat. Maintenance Corp., 81-4114, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit, 12/11/81, 1, N.L.R.B., ENFORCEMENT GRANTED
676 F.2d 704, U. S.v.First National Bk., 81-2063, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Eighth Circuit, 12/9/81, 1, D.Neb., 2, AFFIRMED*, *, See Local Rule 14
1655, 44 L. Ed. 2d 86 (1975). Dakota National Bank Trust Co. v. First National Bank, 554 F.2d 345, 350-51 (8th Cir. The officers of FNB Sioux Falls fear that if the name change is allowed, National Bank may shorten its name to First Bank-Sioux Falls, and thereby increase the risk of confusion.
673 F.2d 1296, U. S.v.Ranney, 81-1623, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 10/6/81, 1, D.Mass., DISMISSED
, HEANEY, Circuit Judge. Grantsburg would document its claim and obtain judgment against Harris Bank in the federal court action., 7, Johnson initially noticed an appeal from numerous rulings made in the state court action, including denial of indemnity for Grantsburg's judgment.
, COFFIN, Chief Judge. Before the case went to trial, the U.S. Attorney was aware that the judge, before ascending to the bench, had been chief legal counsel for Governor Volpe in 1966 when Senator Kelly, a Democrat, had chaired a legislative investigation of the Republican Volpe administration;
Furthermore, it must be noted that this transaction could not have provided for a loan to enable Wiltek to manufacture the equipment because the collateral covered by the leases and other documents apparently referred to finished goods, not raw materials and work in progress.
673 F.2d 1297, U. S.v.Smith, 81-1479, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/23/81, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
Whether this relief can be said to be a direct order to pay money, because the state must issue checks to comply, or ancillary to an order directing compliance with the terms of the AFDC program, is not, we think, a useful or relevant inquiry for Eleventh Amendment purposes.
673 F.2d 1297, Levesquev.Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, 81-1471, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/29/81, 1, Ben. Rev. Bd., 2, PETITION DENIED; APPLICATION AFFIRMED AND ENFORCED
668 F.2d 70, 1982 Copr.L.Dec. In short, the suppressed evidence may not be determinative of the outcome of the trial., *, United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation, *, We pretermit the question, however, whether appellant has properly raised the issue of the suppression order on appeal.
No appeal was taken by Michael Roy. Draft No. 3 states at pages 71-72: When the injured party has lost his personal injury action, most of the more modern authorities apply issue preclusion against claims for spousal consortium, a parent's companionship of a child, or medical expenses.
673 F.2d 1296, Grazianov.Ryan, 81-1438, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 11/2/81, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
673 F.2d 1297, MacDonaldv.Gunther, 81-1436, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/17/81, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
673 F.2d 1296, Bixbyv.Commercial Credit Corp., 81-1433, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 11/2/81, 1, D.N.H., AFFIRMED
673 F.2d 1297, Crookerv.U. S., 81-1429, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS First Circuit, 12/21/81, 1, D.Mass., AFFIRMED
667 F.2d 213, Elaine MELANSON, Administratrix of the Estate of RichardMelanson, Petitioner-Appellant, v.CARIBOU REEFERS, LTD., Defendant-Appellee., 2, Plaintiff's intestate, Mr. Melanson, was employed as a longshoreman on defendant's ship on May 13, 1975 to unload 50-lb. cartons of frozen fish.
663 F.2d 348, 3 Employee Benefits Ca 1142, Celia WYZIK, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.The EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN OF CRANE CO., Stephen R. Frey, Plan Administrator, Defendant, Appellee., 3, Appellant's argument that Rule 26(c) extends the time for filing a notice of appeal under Rule 4(a)(1), F.R.A.P.
