947 F.2d 950 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, District Lodge 190, Local Lodge 1414 v. Regal Auto Body Shop, Inc. NO. 90-16731 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. OCT 30, 1991 1 Appeal From: N.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.
941 F.2d 984 138 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2246 , 119 Lab.Cas. P 10,881 SKS DIE CASTING & MACHINING, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SKS DIE CASTING & MACHINING, INC., Respondent. Nos. 89-70324, 91-70377. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1990. Decided Aug. 13, 1991. Michael W. O'Neil, Orinda, Cal., for petitioner-cross-respondent. David A. Fleischer, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for...
952 F.2d 406 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mulade Sam CARSON, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS; L.A. Container Terminals; Industrial Indemnity, Respondents. Nos. 90-70656, 91-70290. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit....
945 F.2d 288 60 USLW 2210 Antonio Raul AYALA-CHAVEZ, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70262. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1991. Decided Sept. 20, 1991. Jay W. Stansell, Northwest Immigrant Legal Services, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner Antonio Raul Ayala-Chavez. Norah Ascoli Schwarz, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Div., Washington, D.C., for respondent I.N.S. Motion for Stay of Deportation Pending Petition for...
932 F.2d 1325 1991 A.M.C. 2563 Jerry EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Eagle Insurance Group, Respondents. No. 91-70175. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 6, 1991. Decided May 8, 1991. Derek B. Jacobson, McGuinn, Hillsman & Palefsky, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. B. James Finnegan, Katherine F. Theofel, Finnegan & Marks, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents Smith-Rice Co....
952 F.2d 407 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Olga Maria MORALES-CANELO, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 91-70108. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 12, 1991. * Decided Dec. 17, 1991. Before HUG,...
951 F.2d 1143 LOCKHEED SHIPBUILDING, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. No. 91-70106. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 4, 1991. * Decided Dec. 23, 1991. Russell A. Metz, Metz & Frol, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Samuel J. Oshinski, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Mehmet Sekin, Seattle, Wash., claimant proceeding pro se. Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits...
945 F.2d 295 Nuclear Reg. Rep. P 20,542, 33 ERC 1772 , 60 USLW 2217 STATE OF IDAHO, Petitioner, Shoshone-Bannock Tribes, Intervenors, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Respondent, Public Service Company of Colorado, Intervenor. No. 91-70094. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 10, 1991. Decided Sept. 20, 1991. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Dec. 13, 1991. On Petition from Orders of the United States Department of Energy. Before WRIGHT,...
944 F.2d 910 The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission v. Interstate Commerce Commission NO. 91-70015 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. SEP 18, 1991 1 Appeal From: I.C.C. 2 AFFIRMED.
944 F.2d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. PORT OF WHITMAN COUNTY, WASHINGTON, Petitioner, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Respondent. The WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Respondent. Nos. 90-70694,...
951 F.2d 360 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jimmy HAUL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gordon GRITTER, M.D., et al., Respondents-Appellees. No. 91-56012. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 12, 1991. * Decided Dec. 19, 1991. Before WALLACE, Chief...
942 F.2d 791 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. JARROW FORMULAS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATURE'S WAY PRODUCTS, INC., an Arizona corporation, and Murdock International Corp., an Arizona corporation, Defendants-Appellees. JARROW FORMULAS, INC....
952 F.2d 406 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio ANGULO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 91-55538. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 2, 1991. * Decided Dec. 17, 1991. Before PREGERSON, CANBY and...
951 F.2d 358 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sharon ALTENHOFF, aka Sharon Neely, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, Department of Corrections, State of California; John Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. Nos....
951 F.2d 365 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Nelly URIBE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT; Darryl Gates, Police Chief; County of Los Angeles; Ronald W. Reagan, Former President of the United States; Nancy Reagan, Former 1st Lady; George Bush,...
951 F.2d 361 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellee, and Arlington Ray Robbins, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Brian BILBRAY, in his official capacity as member of San Diego County Board of Supervisors, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55316....
951 F.2d 361 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ernest MARTEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY; State Farm Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued...
949 F.2d 400 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. Michael D. HASTINGS, Defendant/Appellant. Michael D. HASTINGS, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellee. Nos. 89-50525, 91-55253. United States Court...
949 F.2d 399 HASTINGS v. U.S. NO. 91-55253 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Dec. 4, 1991. 1 Appeal From: C.D.Cal. 2 AFFIRMED.
953 F.2d 500 13 ITRD 2246, 60 USLW 2496, 21 Fed.R.Serv.3d 660, 21 U.S.P.Q.2d 1493 OCEAN GARDEN, INC., Plaintiff-counterdefendant-Appellee, v. MARKTRADE COMPANY, INC.; Alberto J. Soler, Defendants-counterclaimants-Appellants. No. 91-55218. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 1991. Decided Dec. 31, 1991. Harlan P. Huebner and Edouard V. Rosa, Huebner & Rosa, Los Angeles, Cal., R. Joseph Trojan, on brief, for defendants-counterclaimants-appellants. Jeffrey M....
