DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION vs FOSTER-WEBB ENTERPRISES, INC.
DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE vs PHYLLIS LEAR NEWPORT
DAIMLER CHRYSLER MOTORS CORPORATION; EAST ORLANDO ACQUISITION, INC.; STEVEN D. LAMB; AND KENNEDY SMITH, D/B/A GREENWAY DODGE vs BOB DANCE, INC.
KAWASAKI MOTOR CORPORATION AND XTREME POWERSPORTS, INC. vs POWERSPORTS OF TAMPA
DAEWOO MOTOR AMERICA, INC., AND HERNANDO AUTO RESOURCES, INC. vs LOVE NISSAN, INC., D/B/A LOVE DAEWOO
DAEWOO MOTOR AMERICA, INC., AND TEAM AUTOMOTIVE ENTERPRISE, INC vs BRANDON BUICK, INC., D/B/A BRANDON DAEWOO
DONNA BERRY vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENISTRY vs PARKER W. SHAFFER, D.M.D.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENISTRY vs IGNACIO J. ITURRALDE, D.M.D.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENISTRY vs STEVEN GLICKMAN, D.D.S.
At issue in this proceeding is whether Miranda P. Larkin, a minor, suffered an injury for which compensation should be awarded under the Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan.Infant did not present with a substantial motor or mental impairment. Therefore, claim was not compensable.
FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, STATE FIRE MARSHALL`S OFFICE
The basic issue in this case concerns whether, upon consideration of the responses to ITB-DOT-00-01-4004, the Department of Transportation's ("Department's") intended action to award the subject contract to All-American Towing, Inc., "is contrary to the agency's governing statutes, the agency's rules or policies, or the bid or proposal specifications."Contract should not be awarded to a bidder that is a dissolved corporation.
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent's license to practice contracting, license number CG C033931, based on the violations of Section 489.129(1), Florida Statutes, as charged in the Administrative Complaint filed against Respondent in this proceeding.Licensed contractor abandoned and mismanaged project causing financial harm to customer; failed to subcontract for portions for which he was not licensed; failed to have local inspections; and failed to advise customer of...
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES vs THE PLAY STAY-TION, INC.
GARRETT DORSEY vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
The issue is whether Respondent should be assessed a $150.00 civil penalty for violating Rule 65C-22.001, Florida Administrative Code, in three respects.Agency established that day care failed to properly supervise children on two occasions; $100 fine imposed.
** vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
REBECCA WHALEN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
JOY ADELMAN vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
