OPINION VAIDIK, Judge. Case Summary Appellant, R.H., claims on appeal that fundamental error occurred during his trial when a witness testified that R.H. had invoked his Miranda right to remain silent, that the trial court erred in excluding a facsimile from evidence and that his consecutive sentences were unreasonable. Because the evidence in this case was overwhelming, the testimony regarding R.H.'s decision to remain silent did not constitute fundamental error. Furthermore, the trial...
