The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit (in case citations, 1st Cir.) is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the district courts in the following districts:
MoreHowe argued in the bankruptcy court that under Rhode Island common law, his unliquidated legal claims against others could not be seized and that they therefore fell within the statute's provision for property exempted from attachment and execution . by the policy of the law. In Rhode Island Nat.
Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.
That decision affirmed an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Massachusetts (the bankruptcy court), disqualifying Miller from serving as counsel for Independent Engineering Company, Inc. (the Debtor), and requiring him to return all fees and retainers to the Debtor.
Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.
THOMAS MILLER, ESQ.between the Debtor, Miller, and Peterson.application.filed no fee applications.counsel by March 2, 1994. See Williams v. Poulos, 11 F.3d 271, 278 (1st Cir.bankruptcy court's order was ambiguous.that fees in bankruptcy cases .modification, and outright cancellation by the Court).
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 99-9002 IN RE: LEE C. CHRISTO, Debtor. Christo's personal injury claims had not yet been settled; This contrast on its face is evidence that Congress chose not to aggregate all bodily injury exemptions.
194 F.3d 1279 (Fed., The derivative breach of contract claims, A., 39, First Hartford also contends that it has standing to bring, and the Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction to hear, claims brought derivatively on behalf of Dollar for breach of the Amended Agreement. See 5 James Wm.
Defendant, Appellant.Boudin and Lipez, Circuit Judges.Maria H. Sandoval on brief for appellant.United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.Per Curiam.court in its Opinion and Order dated October 1, 1999.
Defendant, Appellant.Boudin and Lipez, Circuit Judges., Maria H. Sandoval on brief for appellant.Assistant United States Attorney, and Michelle Morales, Assistant, United States Attorney, on brief for appellee., Per Curiam.
Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.
, 13, Ricky Smith, is not directly analogous to this case because an earlier version of c. 93B (the previous statute) enacted in 1970, with a substantively different definition of RMA, applied to that case. 14 Mass. App., 21, The court then considered alternative arguments made by the dealers.
Defendant, Appellee.and Lipez, Circuit Judge.Sharon Hughes Mendonca on brief pro se.Per Curiam.stated by the district court in its Order dated July 27, 1999.jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
and Lipez, Circuit Judge., Robin Aaronson Maher and Segalini Neville on brief for, appellee. See District, of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 476, (1983) ([A] United States District Court has no authority to, review final judgments of a state court in judicial, proceedings.
Circuit Judges. The district court denied the, motion on the ground that Trustmark's appeal from the denial of, pre-judgment interest indirectly challenges the validity of the, judgment, so execution cannot issue . BASF Corp. v. Old World Trading Co., 979 F.2d 615, 617, (7th Cir.
The district court denied the motion on the ground that Trustmark's appeal from the denial of pre-judgment interest indirectly challenges the validity of the judgment, so execution cannot issue . BASF Corp. v. Old World Trading Co., 979 F.2d 615, 617 (7th Cir.
Defendants, Appellees.and Lipez, Circuit Judge.Crisanto Mendonca on brief pro se.Per Curiam.that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
Defendants, Appellees.and Lipez, Circuit Judge., Crisanto Mendonca on brief pro se., Per Curiam. , See District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S., 462, 476 (1983) ([A] United States District Court has no, authority to review final judgments of a state court in, judicial proceedings.
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 99-1812 RHODE ISLAND ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v. SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, Defendant, Appellant. See Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 167-68 (1997).
199 F.3d 26 (1st Cir. See Wilson v. Stocker, 819 F.2d 943, 947 n.3 (10th Cir. See, e.g., Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922, 937 (1982) (stating that an alleged constitutional deprivation caused by a rule of conduct imposed by the State can satisfy the state action requirement).
Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.
