Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Mitsubishi Goshi Kaisha v. J. Aron & Co., 93 (1926)

16 F.2d 185 (1926) MITSUBISHI GOSHI KAISHA v. J. ARON & CO., Inc. No. 93. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 6, 1926. *186 Murrey Corrington and Bouvier & Beale, all of New York City, for plaintiff in error. Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City (Cletus Keating and James H. Herbert, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The buyer...

# 1
United States v. Kirschenblatt, 88 (1926)

16 F.2d 202 (1926) UNITED STATES v. KIRSCHENBLATT. No. 88. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 6, 1926. John M. Harlan, of New York City, for the United States. Leo H. Klugherz, of New York City, for defendant in error. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The officers' entry under the warrant was lawful, the warrant itself being sufficiently supported by the affidavits. The arrest was also lawful, so that the...

# 2
Fitkin v. Century Oil Co., 87 (1926)

16 F.2d 22 (1926) FITKIN et al. v. CENTURY OIL CO. (MARYLAND) et al. GUARANTY TRUST CO. OF NEW YORK v. LA PORTE OIL & REFINING CORPORATION (MARYLAND). No. 87. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 6, 1926. Gilman & Unger, of New York City, for appellant. Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City (William C. Cannon, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. MANTON, Circuit Judge. By order of the District Court, a...

# 3
In Re Pearlman, 82 (1926)

16 F.2d 20 (1926) In re PEARLMAN. No. 82. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 6, 1926. *21 Arthur Leonard Ross, of New York City, for petitioner. Israel Akselrod, of New York City, for respondent. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). We have ignored the absence of any proper return to the District Court, the practice being so loose, and have examined the record as best we can. It is destitute of any proof that at...

# 4
Warner v. Walsh, 65 (1926)

15 F.2d 367 (1926) WARNER v. WALSH, Collector of Internal Revenue. No. 65. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 8, 1926. *368 Marsh, Stoddard & Day, of Bridgeport, Conn. (Paul Armitage and Edward Holloway, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error. John Buckley, U. S. Atty., and John A. Danaher, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn. (A. W. Gregg, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and T. H. Lewis, Jr., Sp. Atty., Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D....

# 5
The Washington, 61 (1926)

16 F.2d 206 (1926) THE WASHINGTON. No. 61. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 6, 1926. *207 *208 Bertha Rembaugh, of New York City, in pro. per. James W. Ryan and Bigham, Englar & Jones, all of New York City, for libelants Hallin and De Matteis. George A. Voss, of New York City (Alton W. Teale, of New York City, of counsel), for respondents James Auditore & Co. and another. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above)....

# 6
NATIONAL ELECTRIC, ETC. v. Automatic Ticket R. Corp., 53 (1926)

15 F.2d 257 (1926) NATIONAL ELECTRIC TICKET REGISTER CO v. AUTOMATIC TICKET REGISTER CORPORATION. No. 53. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 15, 1926. Cornwall, Bedell & Janus and Rodney Bedell, all of St. Louis, Mo., and Fraser, Myers & Manley, of New York City, for appellant. E. W. Marshall, of New York City, for appellee. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MACK, Circuit Judges. HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). The patentee's view of his own achievement is...

# 7
Second Nat. Bank v. M. Samuel & Sons, 50 (1926)

12 F.2d 963 (1926) SECOND NAT. BANK OF TOLEDO v. M. SAMUEL & SONS, Inc. No. 50. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 10, 1926. Morris, Plante & Saxe, of New York City (Merton E. Lewis, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Morris D. Kopple, of New York City (Herbert D. Cohen, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee. Before ROGERS, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. ROGERS, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). It appears that the War Department of the government...

# 8
In Re Fuller, 5 (1926)

15 F.2d 294 (1926) In re FULLER et al. Petition of STONEHAM. No. 5. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 1, 1926. *295 Max D. Steuer, of New York City (Harold H. Corbin, of Saratoga Springs, N. Y., of counsel), for Stoneham. Chadbourne, Hunt, Jaeckel & Brown, of New York City (William M. Chadbourne and Carroll R. Ward, both of New York City, of counsel), for intervening creditors. Kohlman & Austrian, of New York City (Saul J. Lance and Carl J. Austrian, both of New York City, of...

# 9
Irving Nat. Bank v. Law, 46 (1926)

10 F.2d 721 (1926) IRVING NAT. BANK v. LAW. No. 46. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. February 1, 1926. *722 Guthrie B. Plante, of New York City, for plaintiff in error. Platt, Field & Taylor, of New York City (Martin Taylor, Almet F. Jenks, Jr., and N. T. Guernsey, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error. Before ROGERS, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. HAND, Circuit Judge. Upon rehearing, the plaintiff brings to our attention two cases decided by the Court of...

# 10
Knickerbocker Merchandising Co. v. United States, 404 (1926)

13 F.2d 544 (1926) KNICKERBOCKER MERCHANDISING CO., Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 404. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 14, 1926. *545 Hayward & Clark, of New York City (John Holley Clark, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs in error. Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (David P. Siegel and W. Houston Kenyon, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States. Before MANTON, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges. HAND,...

# 11
Van Riper v. United States, 401-403, 405, 406 (1926)

13 F.2d 961 (1926) VAN RIPER et al. v. UNITED STATES, and four other cases. Nos. 401-403, 405, 406. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 27, 1926. *962 *963 *964 Joseph F. Kroppy, of New York City, for plaintiff in error Hedrick. Alexander T. Hussey, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error Sweet and Ish. Patrick J. Dowd, of Waltham, Mass., John P. Feeney, of Boston, Mass., and Thomas H. Mahoney, of New York City, for plaintiffs in error Maloney and McCluskey. Andrew Foulds, Jr., of...

# 12
Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 4 (1926)

15 F.2d 274 (1926) HARRIET HUBBARD AYER, Inc., v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. No. 4. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 1, 1926. *275 Marlow & Hines, of New York City (Ernest W. Marlow, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Bayard T. Hainer, Chief Counsel, and Adrien F. Busick, Asst. Chief Counsel of Federal Trade Commission, James T. Clark, and James W. Nichol, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges. MANTON, Circuit Judge....

# 13
Bentel v. United States, 396 (1926)

13 F.2d 327 (1926) BENTEL v. UNITED STATES. AMOS v. SAME. No. 396. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 17, 1926. *328 David V. Cahill, of New York City, for plaintiff in error Bentel. Gallert, Hilborn & Raphael and David J. Gallert, all of New York City, for plaintiff in error Amos. Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Frederic R. Coudert and David P. Seigel, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of New York City, of counsel), for the United States. Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and HAND,...

# 14
United States v. Davis, 393 (1926)

13 F.2d 630 (1926) UNITED STATES ex rel. KLONIS v. DAVIS, Secretary of Labor, et al. No. 393. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 13, 1926. Peasley & Klein and Mascolo, McKnight & Dauch, all of Waterbury, Conn. (James C. Thomas, of New York City, and Edward Mascolo, of Waterbury, Conn., of counsel), for appellant. Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Charles Lincoln Sylvester, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees. Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges....

# 15
Armstrong v. De Forest, 390 (1926)

13 F.2d 438 (1926) ARMSTRONG et al. v. DE FOREST et al. No. 390. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 12, 1926. *439 Thomas Ewing, Drury W. Cooper, and John C. Kerr, all of New York City, for appellants. Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Samuel E. Darby, of New York City, for appellee De Forest. Harry E. Knight and Clifton V. Edwards, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for the Secretary of the Navy and Alexander Meissner. Before HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges. HOUGH, Circuit...

# 16
Decorative Stone Co. v. Building Trades Council, 383 (1926)

13 F.2d 123 (1926) DECORATIVE STONE CO. v. BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL OF WESTCHESTER COUNTY et al. No. 383. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. June 1, 1926. Gleason, McLanahan, Merritt & Ingraham, of New York City (Walter Gordon Merritt, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Sydney A. Syme and William S. Coffey, both of Mt. Vernon, N. Y., for appellees. Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Several questions of importance and difficulty have been argued, but we...

# 17
Higgins v. Foster, 376 (1926)

12 F.2d 646 (1926) HIGGINS v. FOSTER, Prohibition Administrator, et al. No. 376. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 5, 1926. On Rehearing June 1, 1926. *647 Lewis Landes, of New York City, for appellant. Emory R. Buckner, U. S. Atty., of New York City (C. D. Williams, of New York City, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee. Falk & Orleans, of New York City (Samuel Falk, of New York City, of counsel), for Olivett Distributing Co., amici curiƦ. Before ROGERS, HAND, and MACK,...

# 18
Arkell & Douglas v. United States, 374 (1926)

13 F.2d 555 (1926) ARKELL & DOUGLAS, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES. THOMAS G. PLANT CO. v. SAME. No. 374. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 12, 1926. Bigham, Englar & Jones, of New York City (D. Roger Englar and Henry B. Potter, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellants. William A. De Groot, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Horace M. Gray, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States. Before MANTON, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges. MANTON,...

# 19
Lyon v. Boh, 37 (1926)

10 F.2d 30 (1926) LYON et al. v. BOH et al. No. 37. Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. January 15, 1926. *31 *32 *33 Drury W. Cooper and H. Frank Wiegand, both of New York City, for appellants. Frederick S. Duncan and John H. Hilliard, both of New York City, for appellees. Before ROGERS, HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges. HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above). By taking notice of the decision in the Ninth Circuit in Weaver v. American Chain Co., and, remembering that...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer