Elawyers Elawyers
Virginia| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

District Court, C.D. California

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Yu v. Newport Emergency Medical Group, Inc., 8:19-cv-01067-JLS-ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 8:19-cv-01067-JLS-ADS.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS ORDERED THAT THIS ACTION BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITH PREJUDICE, with each party bearing that party's own attorney's fees and costs. The Court retains jurisdiction over this action to enforce the settlement agreement. IT IS SO ORDERED.

# 1
Ruiz-Esparza v. Saul, 8:19-cv-00661. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 8:19-cv-00661.

[PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES SHASHI H. KEWALRAMANI , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the parties' Stipulation for Award and Payment of Attorney Fees: IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay attorney fees and expenses the amount of FIVE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED AND NO CENTS ($5,900.00), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation.

# 2
A&A Cosmetics Inc. v. Morfose USA Inc., 19-cv-00372 PSG (DFM). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 19-cv-00372 PSG (DFM).

PROTECTIVE ORDER DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK , Magistrate Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: BASED UPON THE STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person or party subject to this Order — including, without limitation, the parties to this action, their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this...

# 3
Fred G. L. v. Saul, 8:18-01543 ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 8:18-01543 ADS.

JUDGMENT OF REMAND AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 23, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand. FootNotes 1. Plaintiff's name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5....

# 4
Fred G. L. v. Saul, 8:18-01543 ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 8:18-01543 ADS.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Fred G. L. 1 ("Plaintiff") challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul 2 , Commissioner of Social Security's (hereinafter "Commissioner" or "Defendant") denial of his application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits ("DIB"). For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED. II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL A review of the entire...

# 5
Sargsyan v. Barr, EDCV 19-2429-PSG (KS). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 04, 2020 Citations: EDCV 19-2429-PSG (KS).

JUDGMENT PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Order, IT IS ADJUDGED that Respondents' Motion to Dismiss is granted and this action is dismissed without prejudice.

# 6
Leal v. County of San Bernardino, 5:19-cv-01736 JFW (SHKx). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 18, 2020 Citations: 5:19-cv-01736 JFW (SHKx).

JUDGMENT JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . The moving papers, opposition and reply, having been presented and fully considered, and in accordance with the Court's March 12, 2020 Order granting Judgment on the Pleadings in favor of Defendants, County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino Sheriff's Department, Jeff Rose, A. Cueto, J. Warren, Keith Lewis, E. Burke, Wayne Sullivan, Jeffrey Haga, Stacimae Cota, B. Navarro (sued as SCS Fischer), P. Stafford, and K. Johnson on Plaintiffs, Maria Leal'...

# 7
Castillo v. Johnson, EDCV 18-2187-VAP (KK). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 18, 2020 Citations: EDCV 18-2187-VAP (KK).

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Johnson's Motion to Dismiss the Third...

# 8
Linda E.S.-M. v. Saul, 5:18-01991 ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 5:18-01991 ADS.

JUDGMENT OF REMAND AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 23, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand. FootNotes 1. Plaintiff's name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5....

# 9
Linda E.S. -M. v. Saul, 5:18-01991 ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 5:18-01991 ADS.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Linda E. S.-M. 1 ("Plaintiff") challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul 2 , Commissioner of Social Security's (hereinafter "Commissioner" or "Defendant") denial of her application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits ("DIB"). For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED. II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL A review of...

# 10
Curtis B. v. Saul, 5:18-01051 ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 5:18-01051 ADS.

JUDGMENT OF REMAND AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order, Dkt. No. 29, filed concurrently herewith, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order of Remand. FootNotes 1. Plaintiff's name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5....

# 11
Curtis B. v. Saul, 5:18-01051 ADS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 5:18-01051 ADS.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND AUTUMN D. SPAETH , Magistrate Judge . I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Curtis B. 1 ("Plaintiff") challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul 2 , Commissioner of Social Security's (hereinafter "Commissioner" or "Defendant") denial of his application for supplemental security income ("SSI"). For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and REMANDED. II. FACTS RELEVANT TO THE APPEAL A review of the entire record reflects...

# 12
Sanchez v. Does, CV 20-1867 FMO (ASx). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: CV 20-1867 FMO (ASx).

ORDER REMANDING ACTION FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . On June 12, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court against Doe defendants, ( see Dkt. 1-1, Complaint), which according to removing defendant include Praxair, Inc. ("Praxair") and Nusil Technology LLC ("NuSil"). ( See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal ("NOR") at 1, 13-14). 1 On February 26, 2020, Praxair removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. ( See id....

# 13
Bouyer v. La Pico Plaza, LLC, 2:20-cv-01514-DSF-MRW. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 2:20-cv-01514-DSF-MRW.

Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In this case, La Pico Plaza, LLC failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before April 20, 2020 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be...

# 14
Shayler v. H.L.W. Corporation, 2:19-cv-10978-PA-SK (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 18, 2020 Citations: 2:19-cv-10978-PA-SK

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PERCY JACKSON , District Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, the Court, having considered the documents before it, and being fully advised finds as follows: IT IS ORDERED THAT: Plaintiff James Shayler's ("Plaintiff") entire action is dismissed with prejudice, including all claims stated against H. L. W. Corporation, a California Corporation ("Defendant").

# 15
Hamm v. United States Department of Veteran Affairs, 2:19-cv-10964-DSF-KS. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 2:19-cv-10964-DSF-KS.

Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In this case, United States Department of Veteran Affairs failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before April 20, 2020 why the claims against the non-appearing...

# 16
McCardell v. Madden, CV 19-10094-DMG(E). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 17, 2020 Citations: CV 19-10094-DMG(E).

JUDGMENT DOLLY M. GEE , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice.

# 17
Whitaker v. Burger Lounge III, LLC, 2:19-cv-10011-FMO-JPR. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 19, 2020 Citations: 2:19-cv-10011-FMO-JPR.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN , District Judge . Having been advised by counsel that the above-entitled action has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days from the filing date of this Order, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. The court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not...

# 18
Newells v. County of Los Angeles, 2:19-cv-08384 SVW(JCx). (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 18, 2020 Citations: 2:19-cv-08384 SVW(JCx).

MODIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION [CHANGES MADE BY COURT TO PARAGRAPH NO. 4 NUMBERING AND CURRENT PARAGRAPH NOS. 4, 4a, 4c, 4j, 4l, 4m, 6] [Assigned to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson in Courtroom 10A] JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN , Magistrate Judge . Based upon the stipulation of the parties and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS ORDERED THAT pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c), the following information is protected and precluded from publication as...

# 19
Alcala v. Wolf, 2:19-cv-07710-MWF-JC. (2020)
District Court, C.D. California Filed:CA Mar. 18, 2020 Citations: 2:19-cv-07710-MWF-JC.

PROTECTIVE ORDER JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN , Magistrate Judge . 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS As the parties have represented that discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted, this Court enters the following Protective Order. This Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures...

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer