Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
W. Simon Katz v. Lear Siegler, Inc. And Smith & Wesson, 91-1045 (1990)

925 F.2d 1478 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. W. Simon KATZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEAR SIEGLER, INC. and Smith & Wesson,...

# 1
Eric W. Reimers, and Sun Mountain Sports, Inc. v. Voit Sports, Inc., 91-1044 (1990)

930 F.2d 37 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Eric W. REIMERS, and Sun Mountain Sports, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VOIT SPORTS,...

# 2
Harris (Robert L.) v. Derwinski (Edward J.), 90-7015 (1990)

930 F.2d 37 Harris (Robert L.) v. Derwinski (Edward J.) NO. 90-7015 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. NOV 15, 1990 Appeal From: VABCA 1 APPEAL DISMISSED.

# 3
Dallas M. Patterson v. The United States, 90-5135 (1990)

923 F.2d 871 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Dallas M. PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee....

# 4
Edward Halas v. The United States, Edward Halas v. The United States, 90-5118 (1990)

915 F.2d 1583 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Edward HALAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee....

# 5
Alfons A. Akutowicz & Edwin J. Akutowicz v. The United States, 90-5109 (1990)

923 F.2d 869 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Alfons A. AKUTOWICZ & Edwin J. Akutowicz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED...

# 6
United States v. Anrew-Thompsen Broadcasting, Inc, 90-5102_1 (1990)

914 F.2d 270 U.S. v. Anrew-Thompsen Broadcasting, Inc. No. 90-5102 United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit JULY 19, 1990 1 Appeal From: Cl.Ct. 2 APPEAL DISMISSED.

# 7
Al Mark Gold v. The United States, 90-5095 (1990)

915 F.2d 1584 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Al Mark GOLD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No....

# 8
James R. Matias v. The United States, 90-5086 (1990)

923 F.2d 821 59 USLW 2421 James R. MATIAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-5086. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 27, 1990. Thomas R. Matias, Albany, N.Y., submitted for plaintiff-appellant. James M. Kinsella, of the Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. Of counsel was Captain...

# 9
Roland Dorl v. The United States, 90-5085 (1990)

923 F.2d 871 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Roland DORL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-...

# 10
90-5078 (1990)

923 F.2d 871 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Jeffrey MASSING, Administrator of the estate of Christopher Massing, deceased;...

# 11
Lawrence Cranberg v. The United States, 90-5077 (1990)

918 F.2d 186 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Lawrence CRANBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee....

# 12
John B. King v. The United States, 90-5073 (1990)

918 F.2d 186 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. John B. KING, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-...

# 13
Thomas E. Hall and Deborah R. Hall v. The United States, 90-5072 (1990)

918 F.2d 187 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Thomas E. HALL and Deborah R. Hall, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES,...

# 14
George A. Murray v. The United States, 90-5068 (1990)

918 F.2d 185 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. George A. MURRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No....

# 15
James A. Schultz v. The United States, 90-5065 (1990)

918 F.2d 164 66 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 90-5730 , 90-2 USTC P 50,563, Unempl.Ins.Rep. CCH 15846A James A. SCHULTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-5065. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 31, 1990. B. Gray Gibbs, P.A., St. Petersburg, Fla., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Joan I. Oppenheimer, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief, were Shirley D. Peterson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gary R....

# 16
Ibi Security Service, Inc. v. The United States, 90-5064 (1990)

918 F.2d 188 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. IBI SECURITY SERVICE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-...

# 17
Robert P. Chipps, of the Estate of L.D. Chipps and Mildred Chipps v. The United States, 90-5060 (1990)

915 F.2d 1585 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Robert P. CHIPPS, Executor of the Estate of L.D. Chipps and Mildred Chipps,...

# 18
90-5057 (1990)

915 F.2d 1584 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. ARCATA FOREST PRODUCTS CO., Eel River Sawmills, Inc., J7D Timber, Harwood...

# 19
Juvondi R. Pender v. The United States, 90-5056 (1990)

914 F.2d 270 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.8(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Juvondi R. PENDER, Plaintiff-Appellant. v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee....

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer