Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
Pearlie B. Jackson, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 96-7005 (1995)

73 F.3d 379 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Pearlie B. JACKSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee....

# 1
126 Northpoint Plaza Limited Partnership, and Q-Ratio Texas, Inc. v. United States, 96-5022 (1995)

73 F.3d 379 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. 126 NORTHPOINT PLAZA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Q-Ratio Texas, Inc., Plaintiff, v. The...

# 2
Howard Den Motoyoshi v. United States, 96-5006 (1995)

74 F.3d 1258 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Howard Den MOTOYOSHI, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 96-5006. United...

# 3
Pearl E. Wallace v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3045 (1995)

74 F.3d 1258 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Pearl E. WALLACE, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3045. United States...

# 4
Mary C. Sullivan v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3035 (1995)

77 F.3d 502 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Mary C. SULLIVAN, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3035. United States...

# 5
Edna A. D'Oyley v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3031 (1995)

74 F.3d 1258 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Edna A. D'OYLEY, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3031. United States...

# 6
Eustacio Origenes v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3023 (1995)

74 F.3d 1258 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Eustacio ORIGENES, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3023. United States...

# 7
Christine Mills v. Department of the Army, 96-3016 (1995)

73 F.3d 378 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Christine MILLS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF the ARMY, Respondent. No. 96-3016. United States Court of...

# 8
Leron A. Mims v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3011 (1995)

73 F.3d 377 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Leron A. MIMS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3011. United States Court...

# 9
Leron A. Mims v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3011 (1995)

73 F.3d 376 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Leron A. MIMS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3011. United States Court...

# 10
Horatio E. Morris v. United States Postal Service, 96-3010 (1995)

74 F.3d 1258 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Horatio E. MORRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 96-3010. United States...

# 11
Horatio E. Morris v. United States Postal Service, 96-3010 (1995)

73 F.3d 376 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Horatio E. MORRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. No. 96-3010. United States Court...

# 12
Henry J. Themal v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3005 (1995)

73 F.3d 377 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Henry J. THEMAL, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3005. United States Court...

# 13
Caridad Siega Torrecampo v. Office of Personnel Management, 96-3003 (1995)

73 F.3d 377 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Caridad Siega TORRECAMPO, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent. No. 96-3003. United...

# 14
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 96-1095 (1995)

77 F.3d 502 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENEVA PHARMACEUTICALS,...

# 15
S.F. Hotel Company, L.P., Dba Summerfield Suites Hotel v. Embassy Suites, Inc., 96-1041 (1995)

77 F.3d 502 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. S.F. HOTEL COMPANY, L.P., dba Summerfield Suites Hotel, Appellant, v. EMBASSY SUITES, INC., Appellee. No. 96-...

# 16
The Timken Company v. The United States, and Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd., and Koyo Corporation of U.S.A., 96-1035 (1995)

70 F.3d 1289 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. The TIMKEN COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. The UNITED STATES, Defendant, and Koyo Seiko Co., LTD., and Koyo...

# 17
Magnivision, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest of Al-Site Corporation) v. Opti-Ray, Inc., Magnivision, Inc. v. Opti-Ray, Inc., 96-1006 (1995)

77 F.3d 501 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. MAGNIVISION, INC. (successor-in-interest of Al-Site Corporation), Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OPTI-RAY, INC.,...

# 18
Jose R. Guzman Zayas, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 95-7066 (1995)

73 F.3d 378 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Jose R. Guzman ZAYAS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee....

# 19
Gilbert J. Paris, Claimant-Appellant v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 95-7065 (1995)

73 F.3d 378 NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order. Gilbert J. PARIS, Claimant-Appellant, v. Jesse BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. No....

# 20

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer