Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Find the right lawyer for your legal problem

Faster, Smarter and More Accurate

Supreme Court of California

Find Case Laws by Filters
Sort byYou can sort data by applying different sort criteria
Most Lastest
Most Earliest
The Last Three Years
ZB, N.A. v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, 8 Cal.5th 175 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA Sep. 12, 2019 Citations: 8 Cal.5th 175, S246711.

OPINION CU LLAR , J. — Under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) (Lab. Code, 2698 et seq.), 1 an employee may seek civil penalties for Labor Code violations committed against her and other aggrieved employees by bringing—on behalf of the state—a representative action against her employer. ( 2699, subd. (a).) In Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (2014) 59 Cal.4th 348 [ 173 Cal.Rptr.3d 289 , 327 P.3d 129 ] ( Iskanian ), we held that a court may...

# 1
ASSOCIATION FOR LOS ANGELES DEPUTY SHERIFFS v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, 8 Cal.5th 28 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA Aug. 26, 2019 Citations: 8 Cal.5th 28, S243855.

OPINION CANTIL-SAKAUYE , C. J. — This case concerns the relationship between prosecutors' constitutional duty to disclose information to criminal defendants and a statutory scheme that restricts prosecutors' access to some of that information. A prosecutor in a criminal case must disclose to the defense certain evidence that is favorable to the accused. ( Brady v. Maryland (1963) 373 U.S. 83 [10 L.Ed.2d 215, 83 S.Ct. 1194] ( Brady ).) This duty sometimes requires disclosure of evidence...

# 2
QUIGLEY v. GARDEN VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, 7 Cal.5th 798 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA Jul. 15, 2019 Citations: 7 Cal.5th 798, S242250.

OPINION KRUGER , J. — The Government Claims Act (Gov. Code, 810 et seq.) authorizes plaintiffs to bring certain tort claims against public entities, while also immunizing public entities from liability in particular circumstances. One of the act's immunity provisions bars any statutory liability that might otherwise exist for injuries resulting from the condition of firefighting equipment or facilities. ( Id., 850.4.) The question presented is whether this immunity provision...

# 3
PLANTIER v. RAMONA MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, 7 Cal.5th 372 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA May 30, 2019 Citations: 7 Cal.5th 372, S243360.

OPINION CORRIGAN , J. Before a local governmental agency may impose or increase certain property-related fees and charges, it must notify affected property owners and hold a public hearing. The hearing requirement arises from article XIII D, section 6 of the California Constitution, 1 which was added in 1996 by Proposition 218. 2 The question here is a narrow one. When an agency considers increasing a property-related fee, must a fee payor challenging the method of fee allocation...

# 4
BLACK SKY CAPITAL, LLC v. COBB, 7 Cal.5th 156 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA May 06, 2019 Citations: 7 Cal.5th 156, S243294.

OPINION LIU , J. — Under California law, a creditor can recover a debt secured by a deed of trust on real property through a nonjudicial foreclosure action to sell the property at a public auction. Code of Civil Procedure section 580d provides that a creditor cannot collect a deficiency judgment—that is, the difference between the amount of indebtedness and the fair market value of the property—if the property is sold for less than the amount of the outstanding debt. (All undesignated...

# 5
MELENDEZ v. SAN FRANCISCO BASEBALL ASSOCIATES LLC, 7 Cal.5th 1 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA Apr. 25, 2019 Citations: 7 Cal.5th 1, S245607.

OPINION CHIN , J. — Under California's labor laws, "[i]f an employer discharges an employee, the wages earned and unpaid at the time of discharge are due and payable immediately." (Lab. Code, 201, subd. (a).) Plaintiffs, security guards at what used to be named AT&T Park in San Francisco and is now named Oracle Park (the park), are suing San Francisco Baseball Associates LLC (the Giants) for allegedly violating this provision. They claim they are discharged after every Giants homestand,...

# 6
RAND RESOURCES, LLC v. CITY OF CARSON, 6 Cal.5th 610 (2019)
Supreme Court of California Filed:CA Feb. 04, 2019 Citations: 6 Cal.5th 610, S235735.

OPINION CU LLAR , J. — The City of Carson (City) hired Rand Resources, LLC, as its agent to negotiate with the National Football League (NFL) about the possibility of building a football stadium in the City. But Rand Resources eventually sued the City, its mayor, and rival developer Leonard Bloom after the City replaced Rand Resources with Bloom's company. Defendants responded by making a motion under a California statute designed to hasten resolution of certain disputes commonly...

# 7

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer