Appellee, as complainant below, filed his bill of complaint in the Circuit Court for Manatee County *Page 101 to foreclose a tax deed predicated on the non-payment of state and county taxes for the years 1927 to 1931, both inclusive. The bill of complaint was filed pursuant to Section 794 Revised General Statutes of 1920, Section 1020 Compiled General Laws of 1927, and the appellant, City of Bradenton, was made a party defendant for the purpose of extinguishing municipal tax liens for the years...
This case, through mistake, was inadvertently published without headnotes in 119 Fla. 86 . *Page 70 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 71 The controversy which gives rise to this opinion will be found more particularly related in the previous opinion of this Court herein on February 25, 1935. See State, ex rel. Crim, v. Juvenal, 118 Fla. 485 -487, 159 Sou. Rep. 663, 665. The alternative writ...
This case, through mistake, was inadvertently published without headnotes in 119 Fla. 86 . *Page 70 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 71 The controversy which gives rise to this opinion will be found more particularly related in the previous opinion of this Court herein on February 25, 1935. See State, ex rel. Crim, v. Juvenal, 118 Fla. 485 -487, 159 Sou. Rep. 663, 665. The alternative writ...
This case, through mistake, was inadvertently published without headnotes in 119 Fla. 86 . *Page 70 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 71 The controversy which gives rise to this opinion will be found more particularly related in the previous opinion of this Court herein on February 25, 1935. See State, ex rel. Crim, v. Juvenal, 118 Fla. 485 -487, 159 Sou. Rep. 663, 665. The alternative writ...
This case, through mistake, was inadvertently published without headnotes in 119 Fla. 86 . *Page 70 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 71 The controversy which gives rise to this opinion will be found more particularly related in the previous opinion of this Court herein on February 25, 1935. See State, ex rel. Crim, v. Juvenal, 118 Fla. 485 -487, 159 Sou. Rep. 663, 665. The alternative writ...
Upon consideration of the motion of appellants therefor, and after due notice and hearing of this application, it is ordered by the Court that the supersedeas order entered by the Circuit Judge in this case be and the same is hereby modified so as to read as follows: "On motion of plaintiffs in said suit No. 9367 for an order fixing the terms and conditions of the supersedeas bond upon their appeal from the decree entered herein on October 31, 1935, and staying the execution of said decree, IT...
This is the second appearance of this case here. See State, ex rel. Baskin, v. Klemm, 111 Fla. 667 , 150 So. 517 . In that opinion and judgment we held that the Relator was entitled to the relief prayed although the time for performance under the command of the alternative writ had expired and there we said: "In the present case the relief sought may be accomplished by the amendment of the alternative writ and the issuance of a peremptory writ thereon, so as to require the respondent to raise...
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion...
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion...
This case is a companion case to that of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Fidelity Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, and upon authority of the opinion and judgment this day filed in that case, the judgment herein is affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
This case is a companion case to that of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, and upon authority of the opinion and judgment this day filed in that case, the judgment herein is affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
The writ of error brings for review a judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the respondents, Dave Sholtz, J.M. Lee and W.V. Knott, as members of and constituting the State Board of Administration, forthwith to convene as such Board and when so convened forthwith order that the sum of $8,140.00 be paid out of the proceeds of ad valorem taxes levied by the County of Monroe, State of Florida, for the purpose of paying interest upon the bonds issued by Monroe County dated June 1,...
The writ of error brings for review a judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the respondents, Dave Sholtz, J.M. Lee and W.V. Knott, as members of and constituting the State Board of Administration, forthwith to convene as such Board and when so convened forthwith order that the sum of $8,140.00 be paid out of the proceeds of ad valorem taxes levied by the County of Monroe, State of Florida, for the purpose of paying interest upon the bonds issued by Monroe County dated June 1,...
The writ of error brings for review a judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the respondents, Dave Sholtz, J.M. Lee and W.V. Knott, as members of and constituting the State Board of Administration, forthwith to convene as such Board and when so convened forthwith order that the sum of $8,140.00 be paid out of the proceeds of ad valorem taxes levied by the County of Monroe, State of Florida, for the purpose of paying interest upon the bonds issued by Monroe County dated June 1,...
The writ of error brings for review a judgment awarding peremptory writ of mandamus commanding the respondents, Dave Sholtz, J.M. Lee and W.V. Knott, as members of and constituting the State Board of Administration, forthwith to convene as such Board and when so convened forthwith order that the sum of $8,140.00 be paid out of the proceeds of ad valorem taxes levied by the County of Monroe, State of Florida, for the purpose of paying interest upon the bonds issued by Monroe County dated June 1,...
This case is a companion case to that of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, and upon authority of the opinion and judgment this day filed in that case, the judgment herein is affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion...
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. *Page 260 ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in...
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. *Page 259 The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in...
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See following opinion. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in...
This case is a companion case to that of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, and upon authority of the opinion and judgment this day filed in that case, the judgment herein is affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.
This is a companion case to the case of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion...
This is a companion case to that of Sholtz, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of Florida, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Association, a Corporation, Defendant in Error, case No. 2185, opinion and judgment in which is this day filed. See page 249. The judgment in this case should be affirmed on authority of the opinion and judgment in that companion case. It is so ordered. Affirmed. ELLIS, P.J., and TERRELL and BUFORD, J.J., concur. WHITFIELD, C.J., and BROWN and DAVIS, J.J., concur in the opinion and...
This case is in all respects like the companion case bearing the same title in which opinion was this day filed, except that in this case beside the two contentions made in that other case there is a third question presented for our determination, which is stated by plaintiffs in error as follows: "Where ad valorem tax funds for the payment of the debt-service requirements on road and bridge bonds are the result of a joint levy for the benefit of three issues of countywide bonds, and are...
This case is in all respects like the companion case bearing the same title in which opinion was this day filed, except that in this case beside the two contentions made in that other case there is a third question presented for our determination, which is stated by plaintiffs in error as follows: "Where ad valorem tax funds for the payment of the debt-service requirements on road and bridge bonds are the result of a joint levy for the benefit of three issues of countywide bonds, and are...
