Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
OPINION BY STABILE , J. Appellant, James E. Brubaker ("Husband"), appeals from the amended divorce decree entered October 23, 2017. We affirm. Husband and Appellee, Susan M. Brubaker ("Wife") were married in May of 1997 and separated in May of 2014. The parties share physical and legal custody of their four children, aged six to twelve years old as of time of the the master's hearings. Husband filed a complaint in divorce on August 26, 2014. On September 10, 2014, Wife filed an answer...
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION — SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37 MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER , J. Clarence Burbage (Appellant) appeals from the November 9, 2017 order, which dismissed his petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. 9541-9546. We affirm. We provide the following background. On May 22, 2011, Appellant participated in the shooting of Danny Williams in his left buttocks in an attempt to kill him. An arrest warrant was issued for Appellant....
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
OPINION BY STEVENS , P.J.E. : Appellant, Geden Holdings Limited, appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on February 9, 2018, denying Appellant's petition to strike the foreign judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Eclipse Liquidity, Inc., pursuant to the Uniform Foreign Money Judgment Recognition Act ("Recognition Act"), 42 P.S. 22001-22009. We affirm. The trial court aptly set forth the relevant facts and procedural history of this appeal...
OPINION BY STEVENS , P.J.E. : Appellant Charyn Hamelly appeals from the trial court's order denying her petition for review of the Commonwealth's disapproval of her private criminal complaint against Cherry Lynne Poteet, Esquire. After a careful review, we affirm. The trial court has adequately set forth the relevant facts and procedural history, in part, as follows: [Appellant] filed private criminal complaints against her daughter, Anna Santangelo, her daughter's husband, Michael...
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION — SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 MEMORANDUM BY STEVENS , P.J.E. Appellant, Geden Holdings Limited, appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on February 9, 2018, denying Appellant's petition to strike the foreign judgment entered in favor of Appellee, Eclipse Liquidity, Inc., pursuant to the Uniform Foreign Money Judgment Recognition Act ("Recognition Act"), 42 P.S. 22001-22009. We affirm. The trial court aptly set...
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
OPINION BY STRASSBURGER , J. : Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and Johnson & Johnson Company (collectively, Janssen) 1 appeal from the judgment of $2.5 million entered on June 8, 2016, after a jury found in favor of Phillip Austin Pledger (Austin), and his mother, Benita Pledger (collectively, the Pledgers), and against Janssen in this pharmaceutical failure to warn case. In addition, the Pledgers appeal from the July 11, 2014 order granting partial...
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed.
Unpublished Decision. Citation to unpublished opinion of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania is governed by Section 65.37 of the Operating Procedure of the Superior Court, 210 Pa. Code 65.37. Affirmed — Application to Withdraw as Counsel Granted.
OPINION BY PLATT , J. Appellants, Kenneth Murray, et al., Andrew Burns, et al., Miguel Moreno, et al., Michael Feldman, et al., Richard Barbarise, et al., Roosevelt Adams, et al., and Richard Abbott, et al., 1 appeal from the trial court's May 25, 2016 orders sustaining the preliminary objections of Appellee, Federal Signal Corporation, and dismissing Appellants' complaints 2 for lack of personal jurisdiction. Specifically, Appellants claim that Appellee consented to jurisdiction in...
