Miami-Dade FL Lawyers | Alex Gonzalez -- eLawyers

96-1460 Portela-Gonzalez v. Secretary (1997)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 27, 1997

ASTRID L. PORTELA-GONZALEZ, ET AL. McCarthy, 503 U.S. at 144. Taken in, context, this statement is entirely compatible with the undue, prejudice/irreparable harm consideration outlined by the, McCarthy Court in its discussion of the first potential exception, ________, to the exhaustion rule.

96-1460 Astrid L. Portela-Gonzalez v. Secretary of the Navy (1997)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 27, 1997 Citations: 109 F.3d 74

109 F.3d 74, Astrid L. PORTELA-GONZALEZ, et al., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. 1081, 1086, 117 L. Ed. 2d 291 (1992), courts have more latitude in dealing with exhaustion questions when Congress has remained silent, see Darby v. Cisneros, 509 U.S. 137, 153-54, 113 S. Ct.

89-1635 (1990)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jan. 05, 1990 Citations: 892 F.2d 1122

, 17, Nevertheless, PRPA argues that the complaint against Alonso Carus stems from its noncompliance with the terms of the contract and, therefore, the district court should have referred to the filing limitation period for contract actions, not construction torts. The Court in Fed.

84-1067 (1984)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 21, 1984 Citations: 736 F.2d 831

736 F.2d 831, Juan A. Valles VELAZQUEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.Carlos E. CHARDON, etc., et al., United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Because the policy of political discrimination was still in force in the year before they filed suit, appellants claim, the suits were not time-barred.

80-1548 Ramon Miro Martinez v. Compania Trasatlantica Espanola, S.A., and Third Party v. International Shipping Agency, Third Party (1981)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Mar. 13, 1981 Citations: 643 F.2d 897

643 F.2d 897, Ramon MIRO MARTINEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v.COMPANIA TRASATLANTICA ESPANOLA, S.A. For another thing, federal district courts in Puerto Rico, whose opinions on matters of Puerto Rico law are entitled to considerable weight, 1 have applied Lugo Sanchez retroactively.

79-1309 Constructora Maza, Inc. v. Banco De Ponce (1980)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Feb. 22, 1980 Citations: 616 F.2d 573

, 18, B. The Bank's Reasonable Cause to Believe Maza Was Insolvent, 19, In order to establish a voidable preference under section 60(b), a debtor-in-possession must prove, in addition to its insolvency at the time of the transfers, that the creditor had reasonable cause to believe it was insolvent.

81-1825 American Foreign Insurance Association v. Seatrain Lines of Puerto Rico, Inc. (1982)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Sep. 29, 1982 Citations: 689 F.2d 295

Appellee's insured, Francisco Vega Otero (Vega Otero), is a common carrier engaged in the business of transporting goods by land within Puerto Rico. There is evidence from a driver's deposition and from the receipt issued to Seatrain that the trailers were inspected by the drivers.

75-1307 (1976)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: May 21, 1976 Citations: 563 F.2d 483

563 F.2d 483, UNIVERSAL SHIPPING, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee, v.The PANAMANIAN FLAG BARGE, etc., Defendant in rem, Appellant, Caparra Stevedoring Maritime Agencies, Inc., InterveningPlaintiff, Appellee, Industrial Fibers Corp. and The Puerto Rico Ports Authority, Intervening Plaintiffs, Appellees.

77-1343 Theresa McPhail v. Municipality of Culebra (1979)

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Jun. 05, 1979 Citations: 598 F.2d 603

598 F.2d 603, Theresa McPHAIL et al., COFFIN, Chief Judge. Applying this rule, we agree with the trial court that there was no duty to warn of the danger involved in sailing into power lines or, in the alternative, that reasonable care was exercised by warning of the obvious in the owner's manual.

74-1924 General Trading Corporation, in No. 74-2245 v. Burnup & Sims, Inc., Appeal of John Randal McDonald in No. 74-1924 (1975)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Filed: Aug. 29, 1975 Citations: 523 F.2d 98

523 F.2d 98 GENERAL TRADING CORPORATION, Appellant in No. 74-2245, v. BURNUP & SIMS, INC., et al., Appeal of John Randal McDONALD, in No. 74-1924. Nos. 74-1924, 74-2245. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 21, 1975. Decided Aug. 29, 1975. Alexander A. Farrelly, Birch, De Jongh & Farrelly, Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas, V.I., for appellant General Trading Corp. Alex Gonzalez, Gonzalez & Rodriques, Puerto Nuevo, P.R. Frederick D. Rosenberg, Bailey, Wood & Rosenberg, Charlotte..

Alex Gonzalez