Whether amendments to the City of Bonita Springs Comprehensive Plan, adopted by Ordinance 17-08 (Ordinance) on June 7, 2017, are "in compliance," as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2017).1/The City of Bonita Springs determination that Ordinance 17-08 is in compliance under section 163.3184 is fairly debatable. The Petitioner did not prove beyond fair debate that the Ordinance is not in compliance.

The issues for determination are whether either of the properly proposed corridors (the FPL Corridor or the Alternate Corridor) for the Collier-Orange River #3 230-kV transmission line (the COR #3 Line) comply with the criteria in Section 403.529(4)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes (2003); and, if so, which of the corridors have the least adverse impacts with respect to the criteria in Section 403.529(4)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes, including cost. (All citations are to the 2002 version of the Florida Statutes unless otherwise indicated.) If the Florida Power & Light Company (FPL) Preferred Corridor (FPL Corridor) is determined to have the least adverse impacts, or if the two corridors are determined to be substantially equal in adverse impacts, the Siting Board must determine whether the FPL application for corridor certification should be approved in whole, with modifications or conditions, or denied. § 403.529(4) & (5)(c), Fla. Stat. If it is determined that the Alternate Corridor proposed by Collier Enterprises, Ltd. (CE) and Barron Collier Companies (BCC) has the least adverse impacts, including costs, since this corridor was rejected by FPL for consideration pursuant to Section 403.5271(1)(b), Florida Statutes, certification shall be denied or FPL shall be allowed to submit an amended application to include such corridor. § 403.529(5)(b), Fla. Stat.Florida Power & Light proved by a preponderance of the evidence that its proposed corridor complied with criteria under Section 403.529(4)(a)-(e) and should be certified rather than an alternate corridor proposed by Collier Enterprises and Barron Collier.

The issue is whether Lee County is entitled to a permit to install markers prohibiting personal watercraft in certain waters.DEP not required to review legality or fairness of ordinance on which request for markers is based.

The issue presented is whether the Department of Environmental Protection's proposed Rule 62N-22.005, Florida Administrative Code, constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Proposed rule invalid due to substantially deficient economic impact state- ment and proposed speed zones to protect manatees exceed statutory standard.