Leon FL Lawyers | Avery Dean McKnight -- eLawyers

18-001005 OKALOOSA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs STEPHEN HALL (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 23, 2018

Whether just cause exists to impose discipline on Respondent’s employment; and, if so, what is the appropriate discipline.The School Board failed to prove just cause to support the termination of Respondent.

10-009221 FLORIDA A AND M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES vs MAR'SHELL L. SMILEY (2010)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2010

The issue is whether Petitioner properly determined that Respondent's employment should be terminated for violating certain work standards.Petitioner should be terminated for borrowing $2,000 from a vendor then offering to increase the payments of an invoice to satisfy the personal debt in part.

08-004095 FLORIDA A AND M UNIVERSITY vs ROBERT L. THOMAS (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 20, 2008

Whether Respondent should be required to pay Petitioner’s claimed overpayment of salary as calculated in the amount of $2,603.86, for the pay periods between July 2, 2007, and July 26, 2007, and whether the effective date for modification in salary as assigned by Petitioner should be consistent with the date of Respondent’s amended contract.FAMU policies, regulations, general contract law, and the parties` course of dealing required a salary payback by an associate professor, who was overpaid.

06-001911SED STEPHEN FORD vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 25, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner’s employment position was properly reclassified from Career Service to the Select Exempt Service (SES) on July 1, 2001, pursuant to Section 110.205(2)(x), Florida Statutes (2001).The evidence showed that Petitioner had management responsibilities sufficient to support reclassification under Service First.

05-003365SED JANET MITCHELL vs DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 16, 2005

The issue in the case is whether Petitioner’s employment position was properly reclassified from career service to the selected exempt service pursuant to Section 110.205(2)(x), Florida Statutes (2001). All citations are to Florida Statutes (2001) unless otherwise stated.Respondent properly reclassified Petitioner`s position from career service to selected exempt service.

05-001602SED JAMES A. SNYDER vs DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES (2005)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 04, 2005

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner’s employment position was properly reclassified from Career Service to the Select Exempt Service (SES) on July 1, 2001, pursuant to Section 110.205(2)(x), Florida Statutes (2001).The evidence did not show that Petitioner was a managerial employee or was involved in confidential matters. Recommend reinstatement to Career Service.

03-003838 BABU JAIN vs FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 20, 2003

Whether Petitioner’s employment with Respondent terminated on May 31, 2003, or whether Petitioner continued to be employed by Respondent during the next calendar month.All employment relationships did not terminate within the meaning of Subsection 121.021 (39), Florida Statutes. University`s actions were unilateral. Recommend reinstatement.

04-000631 ABIGAIL MOBLEY vs FLORIDA AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL UNIVERSITY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 18, 2004

The issue is whether Respondent properly decided to deny Petitioner tenure and promotion.Petitioner is not entitled to tenure and promotion due to insufficient publications.

00-000664 FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY AND BOARD OF REGENTS vs CALVIN C. MILES, JR. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 08, 2000

The issue is whether Respondent should be dismissed from his employment with Florida A & M University, as proposed in a termination letter dated August 19, 1999.Respondent`s conduct equated to sexual harassment within meaning of rule and therefore justified his termination.

99-003856 FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY vs JAMES STRICKLAND (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1999

The issue is whether Respondent's employment with Petitioner should be terminated for violation of Rule 6C3- 10.103, Florida Administrative Code.University professor is not guilty of quid pro quo sexual harassment; there is no credible evidence that professor withheld grades as means to gain sexual favors.

Avery Dean McKnight