Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Barry Morris Silver
Barry Morris Silver
Visitors: 26
2
Bar #382108(FL)     License for 41 years; Member in Good Standing
Boca Raton FL

Are you Barry Morris Silver? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-14688  Luis F Cardenas and Lazara Cardenas  (1982)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 1982 Citations: 18 B.R. 75
18 B.R. 75 (1982) In re PROFESSIONAL SUCCESS SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 81-02095-BKC-TCB. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. February 5, 1982. *76 Gary Zwickel, Lake Worth, Fla., for debtor. Robert S. Levy, West Palm Beach, Fla., for Gordon Associates. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THOMAS C. BRITTON, Bankruptcy Judge. Gordon Associates, a creditor in this bankruptcy proceeding, has filed a motion to dismiss this voluntary chapter 7 petition. (C.P.No. 7). The..
07-005047  PALM BEACH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION vs FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 01, 2007
The issue is whether Respondent Florida Power & Light Company is entitled to Permit No. 247895-007-UC for the conversion of an exploratory well to an injection well, the construction of a second injection well, and the operational testing of both wells, which are intended to inject industrial wastewater from a power plant into the Boulder Zone of the Upper Floridan Aquifer.Petitioners failed to prove standing to challenge the permit for deep well injection of industrial waste, but DEP should revise the permit to state the maximum pumping rate and procedure for handling and documenting the handling of hazardous waste.
07-005062  ALEXANDRIA LARSON vs FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 2007
The issue is whether Respondent Florida Power & Light Company is entitled to Permit No. 247895-007-UC for the conversion of an exploratory well to an injection well, the construction of a second injection well, and the operational testing of both wells, which are intended to inject industrial wastewater from a power plant into the Boulder Zone of the Upper Floridan Aquifer.Petitioners failed to prove standing to challenge the permit for deep well injection of industrial waste, but DEP should revise the permit to state the maximum pumping rate and procedure for handling and documenting the handling of hazardous waste.
07-005063  MICHAEL CHRISTENSEN vs FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 02, 2007
The issue is whether Respondent Florida Power & Light Company is entitled to Permit No. 247895-007-UC for the conversion of an exploratory well to an injection well, the construction of a second injection well, and the operational testing of both wells, which are intended to inject industrial wastewater from a power plant into the Boulder Zone of the Upper Floridan Aquifer.Petitioners failed to prove standing to challenge the permit for deep well injection of industrial waste, but DEP should revise the permit to state the maximum pumping rate and procedure for handling and documenting the handling of hazardous waste.
07-003151  PETER "PANAGIOTI" TSOLKAS, PALM BEACH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, ALEXANDRIA LARSON, BONNIE BROOKS, DANNY BROOKS, AND PETER SHULZ vs GULFSTREAM NATURAL GAS SYSTEM, L.L.C. AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 12, 2007
The issue is whether the Department of Environmental Protection should issue Environmental Resource Permit No. 50- 0269698-002.The Applicant provided reasonable assurances that the proposed natural gas pipeline meets the applicable regulatory criteria. Recommend that the permit be approved.
04-004492GM  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, 1000 FRIENDS OF FLORIDA, INC., FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, JUPITER FARMS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC., D/B/A LOXAHATCHEE RIVER COALITION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF THE EVERGLADES AND MARIA WISE-MILLER vs PALM BEACH COUNTY  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 2004
The issue in this case is whether amendments to the Palm Beach County (County) Comprehensive Plan (Plan) adopted by Ordinance Nos. 2004-34 through 2004-39, 2004-63 and 2004-64 (Amendments) to accommodate the County's development of a biotechnology research park on 1,900 acres known as the Mecca site are "in compliance," as defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes.1It was at least fairly debatable that the Plan Amendments to accommodate the County`s Scripps project were "in compliance."
04-001725PL  JIM HORNE, AS COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION vs MICHAEL BROOKS HOLLAND  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2004
Whether Respondent committed the offenses alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Respondent is guilty of violating the Principles of Professional Conduct for the education profession and of an act of moral turpitude and gross immorality.
04-003064  FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, JUPITER FARMS ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL, INC., D/B/A LOXAHATCHEE RIVER COALITION, AUDUBON SOCIETY OF THE EVERGLADES, MARGE KETTER, PALM BEACH COALITION, STEVEN BELL, ALEXANDRA LARSON, MICHAEL CHRISTIANSON, AND BARRY SILVER vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND LANTANA FARMS ASSOCIATES, INC.  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 31, 2004
Petitioners challenge the South Florida Water Management District’s (the District) proposed action to issue Individual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) 50-06558-P to authorize conceptual approval of a surface water management (SWM) system to serve 1,919 acres of a phased, multiple-use development referred to as the Palm Beach County Biotechnolgy Research Park (BRP) and to authorize construction and operation of Phase 1A of that proposed project. The ultimate issue is whether the Applicants provided reasonable assurances that the proposed activities will not be harmful to the water resources of the District; will not be inconsistent with the overall objectives of the District; and will comply with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the District’s ERP regulations, which are set forth in Part IV of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, Florida Administrative Code Chapter 40E-4, et. seq.; and the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District – September 2003 (BOR).1The applicants gave reasonable assurance that the aplicable permitting criteria had been met.
04-003084  PALM BEACH COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL COALITION, STEVEN BELL, ALEXANDRA LARSON, MICHAEL CHRISTIANSON, AND BARRY SILVER vs SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, PALM BEACH COUNTY, AND LANTANA FARMS ASSOCIATES, INC.  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 02, 2004
Petitioners challenge the South Florida Water Management District’s (the District) proposed action to issue Individual Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) 50-06558-P to authorize conceptual approval of a surface water management (SWM) system to serve 1,919 acres of a phased, multiple-use development referred to as the Palm Beach County Biotechnolgy Research Park (BRP) and to authorize construction and operation of Phase 1A of that proposed project. The ultimate issue is whether the Applicants provided reasonable assurances that the proposed activities will not be harmful to the water resources of the District; will not be inconsistent with the overall objectives of the District; and will comply with the water quantity, environmental, and water quality criteria of the District’s ERP regulations, which are set forth in Part IV of Chapter 373, Florida Statutes, Florida Administrative Code Chapter 40E-4, et. seq.; and the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications Within the South Florida Water Management District – September 2003 (BOR).1The applicants gave reasonable assurance that the aplicable permitting criteria had been met.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer