Leon FL Lawyers | Bishop C Holifield -- eLawyers

00-000664 FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY AND BOARD OF REGENTS vs CALVIN C. MILES, JR. (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 08, 2000

The issue is whether Respondent should be dismissed from his employment with Florida A & M University, as proposed in a termination letter dated August 19, 1999.Respondent`s conduct equated to sexual harassment within meaning of rule and therefore justified his termination.

99-003856 FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY vs JAMES STRICKLAND (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 14, 1999

The issue is whether Respondent's employment with Petitioner should be terminated for violation of Rule 6C3- 10.103, Florida Administrative Code.University professor is not guilty of quid pro quo sexual harassment; there is no credible evidence that professor withheld grades as means to gain sexual favors.

96-002855 BRYON K. EHLMANN vs FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY (1996)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 14, 1996

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioner suffered an unlawful employment practice pursuant to the pertinent provisions of Chapter 760, Florida Statutes, and relevant decisional law, by allegedly being the victim of disparate, discriminatory treatment based upon his race (white) by being denied compensation comparable to black professors of equal or lesser rank, credentials, qualifications and experience.Petitioner proved a prima facie case of race discimination based on salary deficiency. Respondent's reasons of insufficient funds and "market" being reasonable to pay blacks more was shown to be not credible and the reasons were pretextual.

91-001426BID FEIMSTER-PETERSON, INC. vs FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 05, 1991

The issues presented in this proceeding are whether Petitioner submitted the lowest and best bid on CTB 5998 and whether Petitioner is entitled to the bid award.Bids-prestablished construction budget, expenditure of funds for project appropriate only when expended for project, bad faith/arbitrary shown.

97-000324RU LASONJA SAULSBERRY vs FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 1997

Does the challenged language contained in the Academic Policy Statement Handbook constitute "curricula" so as to be exempt from rule-making pursuant to Section 120.81(1)(a), Florida Statutes [1996 Supp.]? Is Petitioner entitled to a de novo hearing on the merits of her dismissal from the University pursuant to Section 120.57(1) Florida Statutes in light of the provisions of Section 120.81(1)(f) Florida Statutes?Curriculum was defined. Curriculum and academic dismissals are outside rule-making requirements of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, and jurisdiction of the Division of Administrative Hearings (DOAH), respectively.

94-002139 INDIRA KHURANA vs FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 21, 1994

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice by allegedly retaliating against Petitioner for filing a sexual harassment complaint in violation of Section 760.10(7), Florida Statutes.Evidence did not establish retaliation against Petitioner by FAMU. Loss of mail slot library copy card and failure to hire as regular faculty.

92-007521 ASHRAF AMIDI ACHTCHI vs FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 24, 1992

The issues to be resolved in this proceeding concern whether the Petitioner was not hired or re-hired for the school year beginning August 26, 1991 on account of her race or her national origin. Also at issue is whether the Petitioner was subjected to a hostile work environment while employed by the Respondent, because of her race or national origin.Failed to establish discrimination based on white or asian; No proof host racial environment even if only white; No national origin discrimination proved;Legitimate reason not rebut with show intent.

78-000540 ISREAL KING vs. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DIVISION OF UNIVERSITIES, ET AL. (1978)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 01, 1978

Whether the suspension of Appellant was for good cause shown as indicated in the letter of suspension dated February 22, 1978.Recommend upholding five-day payless suspension for reporting to work while intoxicated after repeated reprimands for the same thing.

76-002134 RALPH WILSON vs. FLORIDA A & M UNIVERSITY AND CAREER SERVICE COM (1976)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Jun. 15, 1977

Whether the suspension of Petitioner was for good cause shown as indicated in the letter of suspension dated August 19, 1976.Petitioner was Absent With Out Leave (AWOL) and given oral and written reprimand as well as suspension without pay. Recommend uphold suspension/reprimands.

Bishop C Holifield