Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Brian Francis McGrail
Brian Francis McGrail
Visitors: 40
0
Bar #603252(FL)     License for 38 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Brian Francis McGrail? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-004173FC  G. B., Z. L., THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN K. L., J. H., AND M. R. vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 09, 2014
The issue to be resolved in this proceeding is the amount of attorney’s fees to be paid by Respondent, Agency for Persons with Disabilities (“APD” or the “Agency”), to the Petitioners, G.B., Z.L., through his guardian K.L., J.H., and M.R.Petitioners' request for attorney's fees is capped by statutory mandate.
15-000034  AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES vs. V-AGAPE, LLC, D/B/A TRACY COURT GROUP HOME  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2015
Whether the Agency for Persons with Disabilities (APD) properly denied the application for licensure renewal sought for the group home facility license held by Tracy Court Group Home, owned and operated by V-Agape, LLC.The agency proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent's multiple violations of the law support a denial of the renewal of its license to operate a group home.
08-002199RP  GERAUD L MORELAND, (II), THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND GERAUD L. MORELAND, SR.; KENNETH GIBSON, THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIEND DIANNA MCCULLOUGH, COLLIN CONE; AND ADVOCACY CTR FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, INC. ET AL. vs AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 05, 2008
Whether Proposed Florida Administrative Code Rules 65G- 4.0021, 65G-4.0022, 65G-4.0023, 65G-4.0024, and 65G-4.0025 are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.Proposed rules to implement Medicaid Waiver Tiers are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.
09-004005  CHERYL MASK-BROCKMAN vs FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 28, 2009
The issue is whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice by discriminating against Petitioner based on an alleged disability.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent discriminated against her based on an alleged disability.
01-004263BID  TOWN OF DAVIE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 2001
Whether the decision to award the bid for Parcel No. 93S101, State Road 84 Spur, was in accordance with the governing rules and statutes or was arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.Petitioner who did not submit a bid cannot establish bid process illegally tainted when it failed to exercise opportunity to acquire property.
01-002704BID  PCL CENTREX ROONEY vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES AND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2001)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 10, 2001
Whether the Respondents' decision to rank the Intervenor, Turner Construction Company (Turner) first for purposes of entering into contract negotiations was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition as alleged by the Petitioner, PCL/Centex Rooney, a joint venture comprised of PCL Civil Contractors, Inc. and Centex Rooney Construction Company, Inc. (PCL/Centex or Petitioner).Protest cannot challenge provisions of a Request for Statement of Qualifications not timely attached as an issue with the specifications.
00-000494BID  METCALF AND EDDY, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND WRS INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 2000
Whether the Department of Transportation's proposed action, the award of the contract in question to WRS Infrastructure and Environment, Inc., is contrary to its governing statutes, its rules or policies, or the proposal specifications.OHM failed to prove Department`s decision to award contract to WRS was in violation of Section 120.57(3)(c); was contrary to Department`s governing statutes, rules or policies, or provisions of request for proposals. OHM`s bid protest should be dismissed.
00-000495BID  OHM REMEDIATION SERVICES CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND WRS INFRASTRUCTURE AND ENVIRONMENT, INC.  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 28, 2000
Whether the Department of Transportation's proposed action, the award of the contract in question to WRS Infrastructure and Environment, Inc., is contrary to its governing statutes, its rules or policies, or the proposal specifications.OHM failed to prove Department`s decision to award contract to WRS was in violation of Section 120.57(3)(c) or contrary to Department`s governing statutes, rules or policies, or provisions of request for proposals. OHM`s bid protest should be dismissed.
00-001202  MORSE DIESEL CIVIL, LLC vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (2000)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 20, 2000
Whether Respondent, Department of Transportation (DOT), properly denied Petitioner's Application for Qualification to perform work on DOT contracts which exceed $250,000.00 pursuant to Chapter 337, Florida Statutes, and Rule Chapter 14-22, Florida Administrative Code.Department of Transportation improperly denied Petitioner`s Application for Qualification to perform construction work on Department contracts.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer