Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
C. David Coffey
C. David Coffey
Visitors: 36
0
Bar #322687(FL)     License for 43 years; Member in Good Standing
Gainesville FL

Are you C. David Coffey? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

94-00978  State v. Kennon  (1995)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 1995 Citations: 652 So. 2d 396
652 So. 2d 396 (1995) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Denise C. KENNON, Appellee. No. 94-00978. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. February 10, 1995. Rehearing Denied March 10, 1995. *397 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Patricia E. Davenport, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellant. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellee. PARKER, Acting Chief Judge. The state appeals an order granting Denise C. Kenn..
2D04-5789  James v. State  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 2008 Citations: 973 So. 2d 1194
973 So. 2d 1194 (2008) George Harlan JAMES, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 2D04-5789. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 16, 2008. M.D. Purcell, Jr., Lutz, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and John W. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. George Harlan James appeals his judgment and life sentence for capital sexual battery. He raises two issues, neither of which was properly raised in the tri..
5D09-569  Alcaraz v. State  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 19, 2009 Citations: 9 So. 3d 634
9 So. 3d 634 (2009) ALCARAZ v. STATE. No. 5D09-569. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. May 19, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
95-000749GM  HISTORIC GAINESVILLE, INC.; DUCKPOND NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, INC.; MARK BARROW; AND JANE MYERS vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE, JOHN AND DENISE FEIBER, KATHERINE BODINE AND DEPARTMENTOF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (1995)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 21, 1995
The issue in this case is whether the City of Gainesville comprehensive plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 4036 on October 24, 1994, is in compliance.Plan amendment found not to be in compliance. On remand, evidence not reweighed since proper burden of proof used in initial Recommended Order.
20-000581  WEYERHAEUSER NR vs CITY OF GAINESVILLE  (2020)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2020
The issues to be determined in this appeal are: (1) whether Petitioner was afforded procedural due process; (2) whether the City failed to observe the essential requirements of law; and (3) whether the City's decision was supported by competent substantial evidence.Petitioner failed to demonstrate that the City did not afford it procedural due process; that the City failed to observe essential requirements of law; and that the City's denial of its rezoning petition was not based on competent substantial evidence.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer