DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT PAUL GAROFOLO, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT, o/b/o ADELE ELIZABETH FILLYAW, Appellees. No. 4D18-1934 [May 30, 2019] Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Revenue; DOAH Case No. 18-001560-CS; Depository No. 06550020892AO; CSP Case No. 2001171022. Ryan C. Shrouder of Spink, Shrouder & Karns, P.A., Cooper City, for appellant. Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Toni C. Be..
Mr. Alan B. Cohn Attorney for the Hollywood Economic Growth Corporation, Inc. Post Office Box 229010 Hollywood, Florida 33022-9010 Dear Mr. Cohn: You have asked for my opinion on substantially the following question: Are meetings of the Hollywood Economic Growth Corporation, Inc., subject to the requirements of the Government in the Sunshine Law when the corporation is assisting the City of Hollywood in implementing the federal HUD 108 Loan Program In sum: The Hollywood Economic Growth Corporati..
538 So. 2d 73 (1989) Anthony Howard WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 88-1017. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. February 1, 1989. Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and John W. Tiedemann, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The defendant was charged with possession of cocaine with intent to sell. The trial..
923 So. 2d 1186 (2006) The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Sergio GARCIA, Appellee. No. 3D05-1806. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 8, 2006. Rehearing Denied March 29, 2006. Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. *1187 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Before WELLS and CORTIÑAS JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge. CORTIÑAS, Judge. The State o..
38 So. 3d 149 (2010) PATROCINIO v. STATE. No. 3D10-1228. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 7, 2010. Decision Without Published Opinion Affirmed.
457 So. 2d 582 (1984) Iris S. GAUSE, Appellant, v. FIRST BANK OF MARIANNA, Appellee. No. AZ-88. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. October 12, 1984. Rehearing Denied November 2, 1984. *583 Donald L. Tucker, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant. Charles Wynn, Marianna and Thayer M. Marts, Tallahassee, for appellee. MILLS, Judge. This case is before the court on an appeal from entry of final summary judgment in favor of appellee First Bank of Marianna (Bank). We reverse and remand for..
473 So. 2d 25 (1985) Arba Earl BARR, a/K/a Floyd Barton, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 84-1719. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. July 24, 1985. Rehearing Denied August 15, 1985. J. Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Douglas S. Connor, Asst. Public Defender, Tampa, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant was sentenced to consecutive prison terms of ninety-ni..
The Department of Corrections sought bids for construction of a health services building for a correctional facility. A discrepancy existed between the written specifications and the architectural drawings for the project. An addendum was issued to clarify the matter. The low bidder (Intervenor) did not acknowledge receipt of the addendum until several hours after the opening of bids. The Department accepted the Intervenor's bid. The Petitioner timely protested the action. The issue in this case is whether, in accepting the Intervenor's bid, the Department acted contrary to the requirements of law.Bidder's post-opening acknowledgement of addendum permits bidder to withdraw bid, is a material variance, may not be waived.
The issues are whether the Petitioner, D.E. Wallace Construction Corp., is the lowest responsive bidder on project BR-116; whether the Respondent, the Florida Board of Regents, correctly rejected the bid submitted by the Petitioner; and whether the bid on BR-116 should be awarded to the Intervenor, Anglin Construction Company.Failure to identify Minority Business Enterprise participation in bid documents is a material defect and cannot be waived.
