welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Chad Wayne Dunn
Chad Wayne Dunn
Chad Wayne Dunn
Visitors: 53
0
Bar #111963(FL)     License for 11 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Chad Wayne Dunn? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 20.43, 456.057, 456.063, 456.072, 456.073, 456.079, 456.41, 456.50, 458.326, 458.3265, 458.329, 458.331, 466.028, 480.033, 480.046, 480.0485, 766.102, 766.202, 832.05, 893.03, 95.11

Florida Administrative Code: 28-106.217, 64B8-8.001, 64B8-8.0011, 64B8-9.003, 64B8-9.013

2D15-5723  Davis v. State  (2017)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 31, 2017
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT HENRY MARTIN DAVIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5723 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) _) Opinion filed March 31, 2017. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Frank Quesada, Judge. Valdoston Shealey, Jr., of The Shealey Firm, P.A., Mullica Hill, New Jersey, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney..
19-002898PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
19-002899PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
19-002900PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
19-002901PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
19-002902PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF DENTISTRY vs CHARLOTTE GERRY, D.M.D.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 30, 2019
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent violated the applicable standard of care in the practice of dentistry in violation of section 466.028(1), Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints filed in each of the consolidated cases; and, if so, the appropriate penalty.Petitioner proved that Respondent violated the dental standard of performance with regard to three patients. Other allegations not proven. Recommend suspension.
19-005314PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MASSAGE THERAPY vs MINGLI LI, L.M.T.  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 08, 2019
The issues in this case are whether Respondent committed sexual misconduct in the practice of massage therapy and failed to appropriately drape a client as alleged in the First Amended Administrative Complaint1 (AAC), and if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent’s license.Petitioner presented clear and convincing evidence of a LMT attempting to engage in sexual misconduct, and violating the standard of care through a failure to drape client. Recommended: revocation and $3,500.00 fine.
18-000528PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN NKOLO MUBANG, M.D.  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 2018
The issues to be decided are whether Respondent violated portions of chapter 458, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent committed numerous violations by overprescribing, keeping incomplete and illegible records, not referring patients for appropriate alternative treatment. Due to his repeated malpractice, his license should be revoked.
18-000606PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs JOHN NKOLO MUBANG, M.D.  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2018
The issues to be decided are whether Respondent violated portions of chapter 458, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the Administrative Complaints; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent committed numerous violations by overprescribing, keeping incomplete and illegible records, not referring patients for appropriate alternative treatment. Due to his repeated malpractice, his license should be revoked.
17-003266PL  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs WILLIAM T. MCKENZIE, M.D.  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 2017
Whether disciplinary action should be taken against Respondent’s license to practice as a medical doctor based on allegations that he violated sections 458.331(1)(t), (m), and (q), Florida Statutes (2008-2010), as alleged in Petitioner’s Amended Administrative Complaint.The Department failed to prove the allegations in its Amended Administrative Complaint by clear and convincing evidence.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer