Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Oct. 02, 2008
The issue is whether Petitioner has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that an indicated rate increase of 67.0 percent, or, in the alternative, a requested rate increase of 47.1 percent, is not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory within the meaning of Subsections 627.062(2)(b), paragraphs 1, 2, 5, 8, 10 through 12, and 14; 627.062(2)(e), paragraphs 1, 3, 6, and 10; 627.062(2)(j); 627.0628; 627.0629; and 627.06291, Florida Statutes (2008).1Fact-finder is unable to determine from a preponderance of the evidence whether either the indicated or requested rates in the rate filing are not excessive, inadequate, or unfairly discriminatory.
