Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Craig Dallas Miller
Craig Dallas Miller
Visitors: 55
0
Bar #101637(FL)     License for 12 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Craig Dallas Miller? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

18-002508RP  FLORIDA STATE ORIENTAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF PHYSICAL THERAPY PRACTICE  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2018
At issue in this proceeding is whether proposed Florida Administrative Code Rule 64B17-6.008 (the “Proposed Rule) constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Board of Physical Therapy practice lacks statutory authority to adopt rule establishing minimum standards for "dry needling" by physical therapists.
16-003819CON  EAST FLORIDA-DMC, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2016
The issues in these cases are whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10432 filed by East Florida-DMC, Inc. (DMC), to build an 80-bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, or CON Application No. 10433 filed by The Public Health Trust of Miami-Dade County, Florida d/b/a Jackson Hospital West (JW), to build a 100-bed acute care hospital in Miami-Dade County, Florida, AHCA District 11, on balance, satisfy the applicable criteria; and, if so, whether either or both should be approved.When evaluated in the context of the applicable statutory and rule criteria, neither applicant for a new hospital in the Doral area of Dade County established need for its proposal.
17-005388RE  FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF HOMES AND SERVICES FOR THE AGING, INC., D/B/A LEADINGAGE FLORIDA vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, AND DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rules 58AER17-1 and 59AER17-1 (collectively referred to as “the Emergency Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether an immediate danger justified issuance of the Emergency Rules.Respondents failed to demonstrate the existence of an immediate danger. Also, Petitioners demonstrated that the Emergency Rules are invalid.
17-005409RE  FLORIDA ASSISTED LIVING ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA NOT FOR PROFIT CORPORATION vs FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 27, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rules 58AER17-1 and 59AER17-1 (collectively referred to as “the Emergency Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether an immediate danger justified issuance of the Emergency Rules.Respondents failed to demonstrate the existence of an immediate danger. Also, Petitioners demonstrated that the Emergency Rules are invalid.
17-005445RE  FLORIDA ARGENTUM vs DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 2017
Whether Florida Administrative Code Emergency Rules 58AER17-1 and 59AER17-1 (collectively referred to as “the Emergency Rules”) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority and whether an immediate danger justified issuance of the Emergency Rules.Respondents failed to demonstrate the existence of an immediate danger. Also, Petitioners demonstrated that the Emergency Rules are invalid.
18-000073CON  ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, LLC vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Whether, on balance, Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10945 submitted by Encompass Health Rehabilitation Hospital of Escambia County, LLC (Encompass or Petitioner) to establish a 50-bed comprehensive medical rehabilitation hospital in Service District 1 satisfies the applicable statutory and rule criteria and should be approved or denied.Petitioner failed to prove "special circumstances" necessary for approval of its CON application for a new 50-bed comprehensive medical rehabilitation freestanding hospital in service District 1, when there was a fixed need pool of zero.
18-000075CON  FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN vs MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC.  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Should the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) approve Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10499 of Marion Community Hospital, Inc. (Marion Community), d/b/a West Marion Community Hospital (West Marion), to add 12 comprehensive medical rehabilitation (CMR) beds to its facility? Should the Agency approve CON Application No. 10496 of Florida Hospital Waterman, Inc. (Waterman), to add 12 CMR beds to its facility?Waterman Hosp., Lake Co., better for "needed" 12-bed CMR unit. Not normal circumstances proved need for two 12-bed CMR units, one in Lake Co and one in Marion Co. Not normal argument was not an application amendment.
18-000068CON  MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, INC., D/B/A WEST MARION COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND OCALA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION AND FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN, INC., D/B/A FLORIDA HOSPITAL WATERMAN  (2018)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 05, 2018
Should the Agency for Health Care Administration (Agency) approve Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10499 of Marion Community Hospital, Inc. (Marion Community), d/b/a West Marion Community Hospital (West Marion), to add 12 comprehensive medical rehabilitation (CMR) beds to its facility? Should the Agency approve CON Application No. 10496 of Florida Hospital Waterman, Inc. (Waterman), to add 12 CMR beds to its facility?Waterman Hosp., Lake Co., better for "needed" 12-bed CMR unit. Not normal circumstances proved need for two 12-bed CMR units, one in Lake Co. and one in Marion Co. Not normal argument was not an application amendment.
17-001913CON  THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION, D/B/A NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 28, 2017
Whether there is need for a new Pediatric Heart Transplant and/or Pediatric Heart and Lung Transplant program in Organ Transplant Service Area (OTSA) 3; and, if so, whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10471 (heart) and/or 10472 (heart and lung), filed by The Nemours Foundation, d/b/a Nemours Children’s Hospital (Nemours or NCH), to establish a Pediatric Heart Transplant and/or Pediatric Heart and Lung Transplant program, satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for award of a CON.Nemours failed to establish need for its proposed pediatric heart and heart/lung transplant programs.
17-001914CON  THE NEMOURS FOUNDATION, D/B/A NEMOUR'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 28, 2017
Whether there is need for a new Pediatric Heart Transplant and/or Pediatric Heart and Lung Transplant program in Organ Transplant Service Area (OTSA) 3; and, if so, whether Certificate of Need (CON) Application No. 10471 (heart) and/or 10472 (heart and lung), filed by The Nemours Foundation, d/b/a Nemours Children’s Hospital (Nemours or NCH), to establish a Pediatric Heart Transplant and/or Pediatric Heart and Lung Transplant program, satisfy the applicable statutory and rule review criteria for award of a CON.Nemours failed to establish need for its proposed pediatric heart and heart/lung transplant programs.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer