Broward FL Health care and Litigation Lawyers | Daniel Alter -- eLawyers

Daniel Alter

Visitors: 130

Bar #33510(FL) License for 31 years

Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Daniel Alter? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 119.07, 120.569, 120.57, 120.574, 120.68, 408.7056, 409.912, 479.01, 479.02, 479.07, 479.105, 479.11, 479.156, 479.16, 641.25, 641.31, 641.52

4D07-482 Creed v. State (2007)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 05, 2007 Citations: 957 So. 2d 1179

957 So. 2d 1179 (2007) CREED v. STATE No. 4D07-482. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. July 5, 2007. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.

SC05-870, SC05-871, SC05-872 Foundation Health v. WESTSIDE EKG ASSOC. (2006)

Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Oct. 19, 2006 Citations: 944 So. 2d 188

944 So. 2d 188 (2006) FOUNDATION HEALTH, et al., Petitioners, v. WESTSIDE EKG ASSOCIATES, Respondent. Health Options, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Westside EKG Associates, Respondent. Humana Medical Plan, Inc., etc., Petitioner, v. Westside EKG Associates, Respondent. Nos. SC05-870, SC05-871, SC05-872. Supreme Court of Florida. October 19, 2006. *190 Craig J. Trigoboff and Glenn Jerrold Waldman of Waldman, Feluren, Hildebrant and Trigoboff, P.A., Weston, FL, for Petitioners Foundation Health, A ..

1D10-1089 Mobley v. Kemp (2010)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 10, 2010 Citations: 35 So. 3d 75

35 So. 3d 75 (2010) Claybourne MOBLEY, Petitioner, v. Celeste KEMP, et al., Respondents. No. 1D10-1089. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. May 10, 2010. Claybourne Mobley, pro se, Petitioner. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Lance Eric Neff, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents. PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Smartt v. First Union Nat'l Bank, 771 So. 2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). WEBSTER, LEWIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.

93-3786 Lewis v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1995)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 31, 1995 Citations: 667 So. 2d 261

667 So. 2d 261 (1995) Deborah LEWIS and Michael Lewis, Appellants, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO., an Illinois Corporation, Appellee. No. 93-3786. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. August 31, 1995. Michael S. Davis, of Boone & Davis, P.A., Wilton Manors, for appellants. Harold R. Mardenborough, Jr. and Charles A. Stampelos, of McFarlain, Wiley, Cassedy & Jones, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellee. JOANOS, Judge. Deborah and Michael Lewis (appellants) appeal the trial court's dismissal w..

06-003683 CITY INN HOTEL vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 26, 2006

Whether the Petitioner displayed illegally erected signs, as set forth in the Amended Notice of Violation - Illegally Erected Sign dated June 23, 2006.Wall murals on a building that was visible from the interstate were illegally erected signs because they were erected without permits. Recommend that the signs be removed.

06-001183 HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. vs OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 05, 2006

The issue is whether Petitioner is required to provide coverage for the gastric electrical stimulation device requested by subscriber B.N.1Petitioner is not required to pay for subscriber`s gastric pacemaker, even though it was shown to be medically necessary. The device is "experimental or investigational" as defined in the HMO plan, and is therefore excluded from coverage under the plan.

02-003762 HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 25, 2002

This is a proceeding under Section 408.7056, Florida Statutes (2002), in which the issue is whether the denial by Health Options, Inc. (the Petitioner), of a request that it cover additional lymphedema outpatient therapy after a mastectomy to treat C.B. (the Subscriber),1 is consistent or inconsistent with the rules and laws that regulate managed care entities.2Federal and state legal provisions do not permit imposition of a durational limitation in present cancer therapies. Accordingly, petition is denied.

00-003480 HEALTH OPTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 18, 2000

Whether the subject Endorsement to an HMO benefit contract language is ambiguous and, if so, whether the subject subscriber is entitled to additional benefits because of the ambiguity.Insurance contract is not ambiguous.