welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. David Andrew Young
David Andrew Young
David Andrew Young
Visitors: 59
0
Bar #498270(FL)     License for 23 years
Orlando FL

Are you David Andrew Young? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

90-8071-CR  United States v. Hicks  (1992)
District Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 13, 1992 Citations: 799 F. Supp. 1148
799 F. Supp. 1148 (1992) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. George D. HICKS, Defendant. No. 90-8071-CR. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. August 13, 1992. Neil Karadbil, Asst. U.S. Atty., West Palm Beach, Fla., for U.S. Fletcher Peacock, Asst. Federal Public Defender, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., for defendant. ORDER HIGHSMITH, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Defendant George D. Hicks' Motion to Compel Government Compliance with 18 U.S.C. ยง 4246, filed June 19, 1992..
75-367-Civ Â? JLK  Allen v. Carlotti  (1975)
District Court, S.D. Florida Filed: Aug. 28, 1975 Citations: 400 F. Supp. 1037
400 F. Supp. 1037 (1975) Stuart ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. Paul C. CARLOTTI, Defendant. No. 75-367-Civ JLK. United States District Court, S. D. Florida, Miami Division. August 28, 1975. *1038 Goldstein, Goldman, Kessler, Underberg, Miami, Fla., for defendant. Irving M. Wolff, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge. At the time this Court entered its Order of Summary Judgment and Judgment, it reserved the right within thirty days from th..
13-002711  BASHAWN BROOKS vs SUNTRUST BANK  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 18, 2013
Whether Petitioner was subject to an unlawful employment practice by Respondent, SunTrust Bank, on account of her race, in violation of section 760.10, Florida Statutes.Petitioner did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent discriminated against her on account of her race in denying her a promotion. Petitioner did not prove that Respondent's non-discriminatory reasons were pretext.
10-006756  TAMARA A. GLEASON vs RICOH AMERICAS CORP.  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 2010
Did Respondent, Ricoh Americas Corporation, (Ricoh), discriminate against Petitioner, Tamara Gleason (Ms. Gleason), because of her gender by demoting her? Did Ricoh retaliate against Ms. Gleason for complaining about gender discrimination?Complaints not stating facts or claims indicating sex discrimination were not protected activity supporting retaliation claim. Female sales manager demoted for not achieving her quotas and failing to maintain sales team size did not prove discrimination.
09-001212  JESSE BLOUNT vs CEMEX/RINKER MATERIALS  (2009)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2009
The issue is whether Respondent committed an unlawful employment practice against Petitioner.Petitioner failed to prove that Respondent discriminated against him. He was laid-off because he did not have required DOT certification, not because of his age or a perceived disability.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer