Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
David Harold Nevel
David Harold Nevel
Visitors: 62
0
Bar #201537(FL)     License for 50 years
Naples FL

Are you David Harold Nevel? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

07-003656PL  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs LAZARO R. MORERA  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2007
The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations in the two Administrative Complaints filed against him, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him, if any.Revocation of certification of law enforcement officer who knowingly provided insurance claim forms for treatments not received and who lied under oath during an internal affairs investigation, an official proceeding.
07-003657PL  DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION vs LAZARO R. MORERA  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 16, 2007
The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations in the two Administrative Complaints filed against him, and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against him, if any.Revocation of certification of law enforcement officer who knowingly provided insurance claim forms for treatments not received and who lied under oath during an internal affairs investigation, an official proceeding.
06-002398  MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs ROBERT KUSE, JR.  (2006)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 10, 2006
The issues for determination are whether the conduct of Respondent was in violation of the employment practices and policies of the Miami-Dade County School Board; and whether the conduct of Respondent, taken in light of his prior employment record and the requirements of progressive discipline, constituted just cause for termination.1Respondent violated Responsibilies and Duties and Code of Ethics by being out of his assigned work area, using Petitioner`s vehicle for personal use, and failing to properly complete his Daily Status Form Recommend a 30-day suspension without pay.
04-001343  MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs RAFAEL N. MEJIA  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 16, 2004
The basic issues in this case are whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Petitioner’s Notice of Specific Charges and, if so, whether such violations warrant a ten-day suspension from work.The evidence was insufficient to show just cause for a 10-day suspension of Respondent.
03-003219  TOMMIE L. WATKINS, JR. vs GREATER BETHEL AME CHURCH AND REV. JOHN WHITE, SR.  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 10, 2003
Whether Respondent violated Section 760.10(1)(a), Florida Statutes, by terminating Petitioner's employment on account of his marital status.Petitioner failed to prove that he was terminated because of marital status.
02-000664  MIAMI-DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs BENJAMIN FULLINGTON  (2002)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 20, 2002
Whether the Respondent committed the violations alleged in the letter dated February 14, 2002, and in the Notice of Specific Charges filed April 3, 2002, and, if so, whether the Respondent should be dismissed from his employment with the Petitioner.School Board failed to prove Respondent guilty of gross insubordination, misconduct in office, immorality, and lack of good moral character; did prove Respondent engaged in conduct unbecoming School Board employee; written reprimand recommended.
97-005922EC  IN RE: EARNIE NEAL vs *  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 1997
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, as City Manager for the City of Opa-locka, violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes, by (1) using his position to engage in sexual, or romantically-oriented, comments, behavior, and/or invitations to female City employees; (2) having a subordinate's car repaired using City resources; (3) soliciting a personal sexual or romantic relationship with a female job applicant; and (4) if yes, what penalty is appropriate.Respondent made inappropriate sexually or romantically-oriented statements to an employee and a job applicant. These remarks were inconsistent with the performance of his public duties. Recommend civil penalty, censure, and reprimand.
97-005924EC  IN RE: MICHAEL JONES vs *  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 17, 1997
Whether Respondent violated Section 112.313(6), Florida Statutes.Assistant to city manager admitted having private car fixed using city resources.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer