Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
David Paul Montgomery
David Paul Montgomery
Visitors: 30
0
Bar #230634(FL)     License for 47 years; Member in Good Standing
Bradenton FL

Are you David Paul Montgomery? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

57134  American Beryllium Co. v. Stringer  (1981)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Feb. 19, 1981 Citations: 392 So. 2d 1294
392 So. 2d 1294 (1980) AMERICAN BERYLLIUM COMPANY and Employers Insurance of Wausau, Petitioners, v. Lynn W. STRINGER, Respondent. No. 57134. Supreme Court of Florida. October 30, 1980. As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing February 19, 1981. *1295 W. Robert Mann and David Paul Montgomery of Mann & Fay, Bradenton, for petitioners. Richard A. Bokor, Tampa, for respondent. ALDERMAN, Justice. We accept jurisdiction in this case to review an order of the Industrial Relations Commission. [1] The Commiss..
63525  The Florida Bar v. King  (1985)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 02, 1985 Citations: 468 So. 2d 982
468 So. 2d 982 (1985) THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner, v. Sandra KING, Respondent. No. 63525. Supreme Court of Florida. May 2, 1985. Gerald F. Richman, President, Miami, Patrick G. Emmanuel, President-elect, Pensacola, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Tallahassee, James P. Hahan, Chairman, Standing Committee on Unauthorized Practice of Law, Lakeland, Catherine L. Dickson, UPL Counsel, Tallahassee, and David Paul Montgomery of Montgomery and Fryback, Bradenton, Special Counsel, for The Flori..
60660, 60661  Smith v. State  (1981)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jun. 25, 1981 Citations: 400 So. 2d 956
400 So. 2d 956 (1981) Dennis Wayne SMITH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. Nos. 60660, 60661. Supreme Court of Florida. June 25, 1981. *958 David Paul Montgomery of Staab & Montgomery, Bradenton, and B.J. Owens, Sarasota, for appellant. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. ALDERMAN, Justice. Dennis Wayne Smith appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Included in Smith's motion were allegations that he..
1D07-1086  Kirkland v. McNeil  (2008)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jul. 08, 2008 Citations: 985 So. 2d 536
985 So. 2d 536 (2008) KIRKLAND v. McNEIL. No. 1D07-1086. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. July 8, 2008. Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
57795  Ray v. State  (1981)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 1981
403 So. 2d 956 (1981) John Hunter RAY, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 57795. Supreme Court of Florida. July 30, 1981. Rehearing Denied October 9, 1981. *958 Lawrence E. Staab and David Paul Montgomery of Staab & Montgomery, Bradenton, for petitioner. Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Eula Tuttle Mason, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for respondent. McDONALD, Justice. We have accepted jurisdiction to resolve conflict created by Ray v. State, 374 So. 2d 1002 (Fla.2d DCA 1979), and Causey v. St..
3D09-171  Deauville Hotel Management, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband (Miami), LLC  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 05, 2009 Citations: 9 So. 3d 628
9 So. 3d 628 (2009) DEAUVILLE HOTEL MANAGEMENT, L.L.C. v. ATLANTIC BROADBAND (MIAMI), L.L.C. No. 3D09-171. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 5, 2009. Decision without published opinion. Certiorari denied.
79-001925  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES vs. THE FAIRWAYS, TOWNHOUSES AND VILLAS  (1979)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Mar. 05, 1980
The legal issues raised and the status of the parties in this cause are seemingly complex due to the manner in which the case was presented on the initial pleadings to the Division of Administrative Hearings. At bearing, it was determined that Fairways was seeking approval of a permit for use of its swimming pool. This application had been denied by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services on the grounds that the pool failed to meet the requirements of Rule 100-5.50, Florida Administrative Code. In order to place the parties in their proper positions, the Respondent, Fairways, was determined to be the movant party and its cross-petition considered to be the petition. The ultimate issue presented is whether the subject pool meets the requirements of Rule 100-5.50 and its use should be approved.Condominium's permit application for pool denied because of building placement and lack of public toilets poolside.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer