Hillsborough FL Construction and development, Domestic viole -- eLawyers

08-006223PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs DAVID RANDALL WOODARD (2008)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 2008

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, David Randall Woodard ("Woodard"), violated provisions of Chapter 626, Florida Statutes (2008),1 and, if so, what penalty or sanction should be imposed.Petitioner met its burden of proof. Respondent`s license should be revoked.

99-001428 ALINA DE ARMAS vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF ORTHOTISTS AND PROSTHETISTS (1999)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 26, 1999

Whether Petitioner is entitled to licensure as an orthotic fitter.Applicant lacked experience to be licensed as an orthotic fitter.

97-004749 ROBERT BOLDERSON AND ANN BOLDERSON vs COUNTY OF MONROE (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 10, 1997

Whether Resolution No. P54-97 of the Monroe County Planning Commission should be affirmed, reversed or modified.Monroe Planning Commission did not error in reversing Planning Department's finding that antique store would consititute continuation of legal nonconforming use of residentially zoned property.

92-003555 DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF LICENSING vs D AND S MOTORS AND DAVID R BLEVINS (1992)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 1992

The issue to be resolved in this proceeding concerns whether the Respondent, D & S Motors and David R. Blevins, Owner, engaged in the business of operating a recovery agency without appropriate licensure and whether the Respondent employed a person engaged in the repossession business without that employed person being appropriately licensed, pursuant to the pertinent provisions of Chapter 493, Florida Statutes.Evidence showed respondent had employer-employee relationship with one doing unlicensed repossessions and helped him on some occasions. Guilty and Fine.

91-005030 FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES vs DAVID HIRSHBERG (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 07, 1991

The issue presented is whether the Respondent, David Hirshberg acted as a yacht salesman without being licensed in accordance with Chapter 326, Florida Statutes.Insufficient evidence to show that respondent came within definition of salesman under 326.002(3).

90-007035 INES D. DEGNAN AND EDWARD J. DEGNAN, KATHRYN CHIRINGTON AND DAVID R. CHIRINGTON, BRENDA B. JEFFCOAT, JANIS V. FARRELL, CAROL B. NEWTON AND ROGER K. NEWTON; CAROLYN VANDERGRAFF AND KENNETH VANDERGRAFF, EMIL DISANO, AND TAMMY SWAINE AND RUSSELL SWAINE vs JOSEPH TELESE AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION (1990)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 05, 1990

Should Respondent, Department of Environmental Regulation (DER), grant the Applicant/Respondent Joseph Telese (Telese), a dredge and fill permit pursuant to the Notice of Intent to Issue filed August 21, 1990, in File No. 521715273. Are the jurisdictional lines setting forth the geographical area over which DER has permitting authority properly depicted in the Notice of Intent to Issue? Will the proposed project have adverse, cumulative impacts on the drainage flow in the area, as well as other natural resources in the locale? Will more fill be needed to complete the designed project than is represented in the permit application and Notice of Intent to Issue?Proposed development request to fill O.12 acres of tidal wetlands sufficiently offset negative impacts with mitigation.

91-000700 DAVID R. NESS vs BOARD OF OPTOMETRY (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 31, 1991

Petitioner has challenged the September 1990 Optometry licensure examination in general, as unfair, and has challenged his grade on portions of the examination. The issues are whether the examination is valid and whether Petitioner was wrongfully denied credit for any of his responses to specific questions in the examination.Optometry exam not invalid-applicant entitled to credit on 1 answer and to retake part of clinical portion due to subject not meeting criteria for exam.

89-005298 GLORIA SUAREZ MUJICA vs BOARD OF MEDICINE, OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY COUNCIL (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 29, 1989

The issue presented is whether the Respondent's supervised fieldwork experience demonstrated in her application to take the examination for licensure as an occupational therapist qualifies as prerequisite, supervised fieldwork experience under section 468.209(2), Florida Statutes.Pet. met requirements for supervised fieldwork experience because supervised fieldwork occurring in the practice of occupational therapy violates statute

89-005624BID MOORE BUSINESS FORMS vs DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES (1989)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 16, 1989

This cause concerns the issue of whether the response of Moore Business Forms, the Petitioner, to an invitation to bid for "self-mailer packages" issued by the Respondent agency was the lowest, best, most responsive bid response and whether the Item 30.700 in the Invitation To Bid actually called for a sample of the bider's proposed "self-mailer package."Petitioner must attack specs by 72 hours agency reasonable in interpret spec to require submission of product sample failure to do so renders bid materially unresponsive

David R. Bolen