welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Dennis Alexander Kerbel
Dennis Alexander Kerbel
Dennis Alexander Kerbel
Visitors: 56
0
Bar #610429(FL)     License for 22 years
Miami FL

Are you Dennis Alexander Kerbel? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 33 U.S.c 408, 42 U.S.C 2011

CFR: 14 CFR 77, 33 CFR 208, 33 CFR 385, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.20, 33 CFR 385.26, 33 CFR 385.26, 33 CFR 385.26, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.39, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.40, 40 CFR 144.41

Florida Laws: 10.15, 120.52, 120.569, 120.57, 120.68, 120.69, 163.3164, 163.3167, 163.3177, 163.3178, 163.3180, 163.3184, 163.3187, 163.3191, 163.3194, 163.3209, 163.3245, 163.3248, 187.101, 187.201, 252.34, 253.02, 253.115, 258.397, 267.061, 334.03, 334.044, 335.02, 335.182, 335.188, 337.401, 337.402, 337.403, 337.404, 35.22, 361.01, 366.03, 366.04, 366.93, 373.016, 373.019, 373.044, 373.085, 373.086, 373.089, 373.103, 373.113, 373.1391, 373.1501, 373.1502, 373.223, 373.229, 373.308, 373.309, 373.316, 373.413, 373.4135, 373.4136, 373.414, 373.416, 373.429, 373.4592, 373.603, 376.301, 379.2291, 379.2431, 380.04, 403.031, 403.061, 403.088, 403.151, 403.501, 403.502, 403.503, 403.504, 403.5064, 403.5065, 403.50665, 403.507, 403.508, 403.509, 403.510, 403.511, 403.5113, 403.5115, 403.514, 403.516, 403.519, 403.522, 403.526, 403.5271, 403.531, 403.5317, 48.20, 48.21, 7.01, 7.02, 713.01, 872.02, 90.803

Florida Administrative Code: 18-18.004, 18-18.006, 18-21.003, 25-6.0342, 25-6.0345, 28-106.217, 40E-2.091, 40E-20.302, 40E-3.101, 40E-4.091, 40E-4.302, 40E-6.011, 40E-6.041, 40E-6.221, 40E-6.311, 40E-6.351, 62-110.106, 62-17.133, 62-17.191, 62-17.211, 62-17.281, 62-17.660, 62-345.100, 62-345.400, 62-345.500, 62-345.900, 62-520.400, 62-520.410, 62-555.310, 62-672.870, 68A-16.001, 68A-16.002, 9J-5.005, 9J-5.006

13-000009GM  ROBERT KEMP, SYLVIA KEMP, AND GREGORY SAMMS vs MIAMI-DADE COUNTY  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 2013
Whether the amendment to the Land Use Plan Map of the Miami-Dade County Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP), adopted by Ordinance No. 12-109 on December 4, 2012, is “in compliance,” as that term is defined in section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2011).1/Petitioners did not prove beyond fair debate that land use map amendement re-designating property for industrial and office use was not "in compliance."
08-003614GM  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs MIAMI-DADE COUNTY  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 22, 2008
The issue in this case is whether the amendments to Miami- Dade County’s Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP), adopted through Ordinance Nos. 08-44 and 08-45, are “in compliance” as that term is defined in Section 163.3184(1)(b), Florida Statutes (2008).1The County`s adoption of Ordinance 08-44 (Lowe`s Amendment) is not in compliance. The County`s adoption of Ordinance No. 08-45 is in compliance.
03-000150GM  SIERRA CLUB AND JOHN S. WADE, JR. vs DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND MIAMI-DADE COUNTY  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 17, 2003
Miami-Dade County's Krome Avenue is a two-lane, undivided highway. In October 2002, the Board of County Commissioners for Miami-Dade County (the Commission) passed Ordinance No. 02-198. The ordinance adopted an amendment composed of several parts to the County's Comprehensive Development Master Plan (CDMP). Among the parts of the amendment were changes and additions to the CDMP initiated by an application ("Application No. 16") that relate to Krome Avenue (the "Plan Amendment.")1 Quite detailed, the Plan Amendment, in essence, makes changes that re-designate a substantial segment of Krome Avenue from 2 lanes to 4 lanes. The Plan Amendment's additions add all of Krome Avenue as a Major Route among the CDMP's designated evacuation routes in the year 2015, create new policies related to approval of use of land in the vicinity of Krome Avenue designated as a four-lane roadway and create a new policy related to planned capacity improvement to the roadway, including widening to four lanes. The issue in this growth management case is whether the Plan Amendment is "in compliance" as defined in the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act.The amendment to Miami Dade County`s Comprehensive Development Master Plan that allows Krome Avenue to be widened to four lanes is "in compliance."

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer