Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Donald Appignani
Donald Appignani
Visitors: 68
0

Free initial consultation

Bar #115071(FL)     License for 27 years; Member in Good Standing
Lauderhill FL

Are you Donald Appignani? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

4D11-4356  George Mato Dotel v. State of Florida  (2015)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Aug. 19, 2015
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GEORGE MATO DOTEL, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D11-4356 [August 19, 2015] Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2008CF011497DMB. Anthony M. Genova, Miami, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Mark J. Hamel, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee. MAY, J. The defe..
FL 75-124-Civ-NCR  United States v. Bowdach  (1976)
District Court, S.D. Florida Filed: May 22, 1976 Citations: 414 F. Supp. 1346
414 F. Supp. 1346 (1976) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Gary BOWDACH, Defendant. No. FL 75-124-Civ-NCR. United States District Court, S. D. Florida. May 22, 1976. *1347 *1348 Gary L. Betz, U. S. Dept. of Justice, Strike Force, Miami, Fla., for plaintiff. *1349 Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, Fla., for defendant. ROETTGER, District Judge. Defendant filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized from his home following his arrest. His arrest was made pursuant to a warrant but no search warrant h..
98-002544  PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs KENNETH DANIELS  (1998)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 03, 1998
Whether Petitioner's employment should be terminated on the grounds alleged in the Administrative Complaint dated June 3, 1998.Non-instructional school employee failed to prove his entitlement to an exemption from disqualifying criminal offense.
97-000702  DADE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD vs GEORGE LEE, JR.  (1997)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 1997
The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Amended Notice of Specific Charges filed against him, and, if so, whether he should be terminated from his employment with Petitioner.School board proved just cause for dismissal of a custodian who was absent excessively, who reported for duty in an intoxicated state repeatedly, and who exhibited threatening behavior towards his supervisor.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer