The three administrative complaints in these consolidated cases allege various violation of Chapter 470, Florida Statutes and Chapter 61G8-21, Florida Administrative Code, which regulate funeral directors and the operation of funeral establishments. Specifically, these violations are alleged: Section 470.024(2), Florida Statutes: operating a funeral establishment without a license; Sections 470.024(6), 470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8-21.00F(1), Florida Administrative Code: not being available to the public during normal business hours; Section 470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.005(3), Florida Administrative Code: not having the funeral director’s photograph with the license; Section 470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.005(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code: not having the latest inspection reports available for inspections upon demand; Section 470.036(l)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.005(1)(c), Florida Administrative Code: not having a current copy of inspection rules or criteria available for inspection upon demand; Section 470.035(1), Florida Statutes: not having retail price list available upon inquiry; Section 470.036(l)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.003(6), Florida Administrative Code: not having the name of the establishment and name of the funeral director displayed at the public entrance; Section 470.036(l)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.003(1)(b), Florida Administrative Code: not having sanitary floors; Section 470.036(1)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.003(5), Florida Administrative Code: not having prices conspicuously marked on the caskets; Section 470.036(1)(a) and 470.031(l)(f), Florida Statutes: employing an unlicensed person in the practice of funeral directing, embalming or direct disposition; Section 470.036(1)(n), Florida Statutes: aiding and abetting an unlicensed person in any licensed activity; and Section 470.036(l)(h), Florida Statutes and rule 61G8- 21.007(3), Florida Administrative Code: failing to insure that all employees comply with laws and rules of the Board. The issues in this proceeding are whether the alleged violations occurred, and if so, what discipline is appropriate.Funeral director unable to perform duties due to serious illness and disability, resulting in multiple violations of statute and rules in his absence. Recommend suspension.

At issue is whether Respondent committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken.While Respondent`s affirmation on renewal application that he was in compliance with all requirements was inaccurate because had not completed continuing education, he did not intend to decieve anyone, and did not obtain his license by misrepresentation.

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondents committed the offenses set forth in the Administrative Complaints and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Broker failed to account for and deliver deposit when due, and failed to maintain or produce records to account for deposit. Revocation of licensure recommended.

The issue for determination is whether Respondents committed the offenses set forth in the administrative complaint and, if so, what action should be taken.Sexual activity occurred at Respondent establishment with Respondent owner's knowledge and permission. Recommend revocation of both licenses.

Whether the Respondent committed the offenses alleged in the Administrative Complaint and the penalties, if any, that should be imposed.Funeral home operated without a funeral director in charge, failed to submit re- ports, failed to have sealed containers, and failed to remove misleading sign.

The issue presented is whether Respondent is guilty of the allegations contained in the Amended Administrative Complaint filed against him, and, if so, what action should be taken against him, if any.Administrative fine against funeral director for refusing to release dead body to another funeral home despite written directive from next of kin.

The issues for determination in this proceeding are whether Respondent committed the acts alleged in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what, if any, disciplinary action should be imposed.Licensee who signed blank contracts and aided unlicensed person to practice is quilty of fraud and deceit; and incompetence for unsanitary conditions.