Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Dylan Todd Reingold
Dylan Todd Reingold
Visitors: 33
0
Bar #544701(FL)     License for 22 years; Member in Good Standing
Vero Beach FL

Are you Dylan Todd Reingold? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

SC15-504  & SC15-505 Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida v. Art Graham, etc. & Board of County Commissioners of Indian River County, Florida v. Art Graham, etc.  (2016)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: May 19, 2016
Supreme Court of Florida _ No. SC15-504 _ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. ART GRAHAM, ETC., et al., Appellees. _ No. SC15-505 _ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA, Appellant, vs. ART GRAHAM, ETC., et al., Appellees. [May 19, 2016] POLSTON, J. In this consolidated appeal, the Board of County Commissioners Indian River County, Florida (County) challenges two separate orders of the Florida Public Service Commission (PSC).1 The fi..
10-005965GM  CLIFTON CURTIS HORTON AND HORTON ENTERPRISES, INC. vs CITY OF JACKSONVILLE  (2010)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 21, 2010
The issue is whether a text amendment to the general description of the Commercial land use designations of the Comprehensive Plan (Plan) of Respondent, City of Jacksonville (City), adopted by Ordinance No. 2010-401-E on June 22, 2010, is in compliance.Plan amendment consistent with State Plan; no requirement to advertise amendment in format prescribed by section 166.041(3)(c)2.b.
07-003539GM  DUNN CREEK, LLC vs CITY OF JACKSONVILLE AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS  (2007)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 01, 2007
The issues are whether the City of Jacksonville's (City's) Ordinance No. 2008-628-E adopted on September 9, 2008, which remediates Ordinance No. 2007-383-E, is in compliance, and whether Chapter 2009-96, Laws of Florida, renders this proceeding moot, as alleged by Petitioner, Dunn Creek, LLC (Dunn or Petitioner).Remedial amendment changing land use back to original use is in compliance; less data and analysis are required for this type of amendment.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer