welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Eric Scott Sonderling
Eric Scott Sonderling
Eric Scott Sonderling
Visitors: 75
0
Bar #85425(FL)     License for 15 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Eric Scott Sonderling? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

16-003099BID  NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 06, 2016
The issues in this protest are, first, whether Respondent clearly erred in determining that Petitioner's application for funding, which had failed to include all of the required financial information concerning its "non-corporation" lender, was ineligible for consideration due to a material, nonwaivable deviation from the specifications of the solicitation; if Petitioner's application was not, in fact, materially nonresponsive, then it will be necessary to decide whether Respondent should exercise its discretion to waive the minor irregularity in Petitioner's application.Respondent clearly erred in determining that Petitioner's application was ineligible due to a material deviation; Respondent should waive the minor irregularity or, alternatively, state the grounds for not waiving the minor defect.
16-001137BID  REDDING DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, AND HTG HAMMOCK RIDGE, LLC vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 26, 2016
The issues are (1) whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation's (Florida Housing) intended decision to award low- income housing tax credits for an affordable housing development in medium-size counties to Grove Manor Phase I, LTD (Grove Manor), JIC Grand Palms, LLC (Grand Palms), Madison Palms, Ltd. (Madison Palms), and RST The Pines, LP (The Pines), was contrary to solicitation specifications, and if so, whether that determination was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition; and (2) whether Florida Housing's determination that Brownsville Manor, LP (Brownsville), achieved the maximum available score of 28 points was contrary to solicitation specifications, and if so, whether that determination was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.Because Intervenor's application contained a material non-waivable error, tax credits should be awarded to Petitioner.
16-001138BID  REDDING DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC vs BROWNSVILLE MANOR, LP, GROVE MANOR PHASE I, LTD.; JIC GRAND PALMS, LLC; MADISON PALMS, LTD.; RST THE PINES, LP; AND FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 26, 2016
The issues are (1) whether Florida Housing Finance Corporation's (Florida Housing) intended decision to award low- income housing tax credits for an affordable housing development in medium-size counties to Grove Manor Phase I, LTD (Grove Manor), JIC Grand Palms, LLC (Grand Palms), Madison Palms, Ltd. (Madison Palms), and RST The Pines, LP (The Pines), was contrary to solicitation specifications, and if so, whether that determination was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition; and (2) whether Florida Housing's determination that Brownsville Manor, LP (Brownsville), achieved the maximum available score of 28 points was contrary to solicitation specifications, and if so, whether that determination was clearly erroneous, arbitrary, capricious, or contrary to competition.Because Intervenor's application contained a material non-waivable error, tax credits should be awarded to Petitioner.
16-000418BID  DOUGLAS GARDENS V, LTD. vs FLORIDA HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 25, 2016
At issue in this proceeding is whether the decision of the Florida Housing Finance Corporation (“Florida Housing”) to award State Apartment Incentive Loan (“SAIL”) funding to Intervenor, La Joya Estates, Ltd. (“La Joya”), pursuant to Request for Applications 2015-112 (the “RFA”) was contrary to the agency’s governing statutes, rules, policies, or the RFA specifications.Under the specific facts of the case, Intervenor's inclusion of a 2014 Surveyor Certification form instead of the required 2015 form constituted a minor irregularity.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer