Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
Frederic Bennett O'Neal
Frederic Bennett O'Neal
Visitors: 59
2
Bar #252611(FL)     License for 46 years; Member in Good Standing
Windermere FL

Are you Frederic Bennett O'Neal? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

USC: 42 U.S.C 3610

Florida Laws: 120.57120.68760.11760.23760.32760.34760.37950.01

91-3993  Elaine Rogers, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees v. Windmill Pointe Village Club Association, Inc., Defendants-Cross-Claim-Plaintiffs-Appellants  (1992)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 03, 1992 Citations: 967 F.2d 525
967 F.2d 525 Elaine ROGERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. WINDMILL POINTE VILLAGE CLUB ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Defendants-Cross-Claim-Plaintiffs-Appellants. No. 91-3993. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 3, 1992. Robert C. Wattles, Orlando, Fla., for appellants. Frederic Bennett O'Neal, Orlando, Fla., for appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Before KRAVITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges, and BROWN ..
02-14858    (2003)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: May 22, 2003 Citations: 331 F.3d 817
331 F.3d 817 Thomas J. KELLY, a registered elector from U.S. Congressional District 8 in Orange County, Florida, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Katherine HARRIS, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and as an individual, Sandra Mortham, Secretary of the State of Florida, and as an individual, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-14858. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. May 22, 2003. Frederic Bennett O'Neal, Frederic B. O'Neal, P.A., Orlando, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. George ..
16-001799  VIRGINIA AUSTIN AND LAURA TOMAYKO vs SADDLEBAG LAKE OWNERS ASSOCIATION  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 29, 2016
The issues are: (1) whether Respondent violated section 760.23(2), Florida Statutes, by discriminating against Petitioners on the basis of their sex with respect to the provision of housing services or facilities; and (2) whether Respondent violated 760.37 by unlawfully harassing or intimidating Petitioners on the basis of their sex in the exercise of their protected housing rights.Petitioners' claim of housing discrimination based on their sexual orientation not actionable. Petition for Relief dismissed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer