Okaloosa FL Lawyers | Gary Alan Vorbeck -- eLawyers

18-4584 NyJuan Bernard Waller v. State of Florida (2019)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Oct. 30, 2019

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _ No. 1D18-4584 _ NYJUAN BERNARD WALLER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. Mark W. Moseley, Judge. October 30, 2019 PER CURIAM. In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we affirm Waller’s judgment and sentence but remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error in the written order of probation. While the transcript from the sentencing hearing shows..

89-3436 (1990)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 06, 1990 Citations: 906 F.2d 524

906 F.2d 524 CONCERNED CITIZENS OF HARDEE COUNTY, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARDEE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees. CONCERNED CITIZENS OF HARDEE COUNTY, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HARDEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 89-3436. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. July 19, 1990. As Amended Aug. 6, 1990. David M. Lipman, Miami, Fla., James A. Tucker, Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc., Fort Myers, Fla...

94-007199RP GBS GROVES, INC., AND CITRUS GROWERS ASSOCIATES, INC. vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 23, 1994

94-005742RP CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 14, 1994

The primary issue in these consolidated cases is whether the proposed Southern Water Use Caution Area ("SWUCA") rules of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (the "District") constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority. Also at issue in the proceedings is the validity of certain portions of the District's existing water use permitting rules contained in Chapter 40D-2, Florida Administrative Code ("F.A.C."), and the "Basis of Review for Water Use Permit Applications" that the District has adopted by reference in Rule 40D-2.091, F.A.C. Finally, certain policies allegedly utilized by the District in its water use permitting program have been challenged as unpromulgated rules in contravention of Section 120.535, Florida Statutes (1993) ("F.S.").Prop method for calculating min aquifer levels were scientif and statistically sound. Prop method of applying min level was invalid. Existing water use permit rules set forth approp consid but vague. Computer method used as screening tool consti a rule

00-000555BID RYAN INC. EASTERN vs PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY (2000)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 03, 2000

The issue is whether Respondent's tentative award to Intervenor of a contract to construct and install a water pipeline should be invalidated because of fraud, arbitrariness, illegality, or dishonesty.Respondent improperly allowed winning bidder and its pipe supplier eight days after bid opening to decide whether to withdraw conditions and exceptions to specifications for a 42-inch pipe, as the conditions and exceptions rendered the bid unresponsive.

94-002765EPP IN RE: SEMINOLE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., POWER PLANT SITING APPL. NO. 89-25SA vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (1994)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 12, 1994

The issue for determination in this case is whether the affiliated facilities and proposed site of the Hardee Unit 3, a fifty acre parcel in the unincorporated area of Hardee County within the site of the Hardee Power Station encompassing 1300 acres in Hardee and Polk Counties, is consistent and in compliance with existing land use plans and zoning ordinances of Hardee and Polk Counties, pursuant to Section 403.508(2), Florida Statutes.Electrical power plant should be certified for construction & operation on 50 acre parcl of previously certified site. Ultimate site capacity increas.

91-000372DRI WILLIAM A. BURKE vs BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DESOTO COUNTY (1991)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 16, 1991

Whether a proposed development of regional impact (DRI), known as "Countryside Retirement Resort" is consistent with the statutory criteria set forth in Section 380.06(14), Florida Statutes (1989), and is entitled to a development order. Whether the application for development approval and request for rezoning was properly denied by the DeSoto County Board of Commissioners.Development of Regional Impact should be denied because it encourages urban sprawl; inconsistent with surrounding land uses; heavy traffic impact; inconsistent with state plan

Gary Alan Vorbeck