Palm Beach FL Lawyers | Gary Keith Oldehoff -- eLawyers

09-10696 Fils v. City of Aventura (2011)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Jul. 28, 2011

647 F.3d 1272 (2011) Cindy FILS, Nemours Maurice, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF AVENTURA, et al., Defendants, Thomas E. Ribel, individually and in his official capacity of Chief of Police for the City of Aventura Dade County Florida, Charles Carlantone, officer #85-0193, Officer Harvey Arango, Aventura Police Dept., Officer Jason Williams, Aventura Police Dept., Sean Bergert, officer #85-0162, Christopher Goranitis, officer # 85-0297, Jeffrey Burns, officer #85-0142, Defendants-Appellants. No...

03-000791 PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

03-000792 CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

03-000804 ALAN R. BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

03-000805 DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC. vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

03-001610 DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2003)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2003

The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.

02-003897GM MANASOTA-88, INC. AND GLENN COMPTON vs SARASOTA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 2002

The issue is whether a Sarasota County plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 2001-76 on July 10, 2002, is in compliance.Numerous changes to the text of the County Comprehensive Plan were all fairly debatable and thus in compliance.

02-003898GM BECKY AYECH vs SARASOTA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (2002)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 03, 2002

The issue is whether a Sarasota County plan amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 2001-76 on July 10, 2002, is in compliance.Numerous changes to the text of the County Comprehensive Plan were all fairly debatable and thus in compliance.

01-003535 CYNTHIA VALENCIC vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND SARASOTA COUNTY (2001)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 2001

The issue is whether Sarasota County's application for a permit authorizing the construction of a Class V, Group 3 aquifer storage and recovery well system at the Central County Water Reclamation Facility in Sarasota, Florida, should be approved.Operational concerns of a Class V injection well should not be considered in an application for a contruction permit. These concerns are addressed in the application for operating permits. Permit is approved.

01-003515 CITY OF VENICE vs SARASOTA COUNTY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (2001)