Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida
Filed: Mar. 19, 1999
The issue is whether Respondent's proposed decision to award a computer-maintenance contract to Intervenor is clearly erroneous, contrary to competition, arbitrary, or capricious.Evaluators` lack of financial qualifications, coupled with their clearly erroneous scoring of the winner`s offer on one financial criterion, rendered the proposed award contrary to statute, rule, policy, and the Request for Proposals.