welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Hughens Dolisca
Hughens Dolisca
Hughens Dolisca
Visitors: 83
0
Bar #99744(FL)     License for 13 years; Member in Good Standing
West Palm Beach FL

Are you Hughens Dolisca? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

14-006004  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs AXIOM CONSTRUCTION DESIGN CORPORATION  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 18, 2014
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, Axiom Construction Design Corporation (Axiom), failed to provide workers' compensation coverage, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner established that Respondent did not have workers' compensation coverage for his workers/sub-contractor. The third amended penalty is affirmed.
14-002598  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs RAUL A. CORREA, M.D.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 02, 2014
The issues in this case are whether Respondent, Raul A. Correa, M.D. (Dr. Correa), failed to provide workers' compensation coverage, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Respondent did not have workers' compensation coverage on his employees at the time the Department conducted its compliance investigation. The Amended Penalty Assessment is confirmed.
13-002447  DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs OGLES CONSTRUCTION AND ROOFING, LLC  (2013)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 02, 2013
Whether Petitioner, Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers’ Compensation (the Department), properly issued a Stop-Work Order and Penalty Assessment against Respondent, Ogles Construction and Roofing, LLC (Respondent), for failing to obtain workers' compensation insurance that meets the requirements of chapter 440, Florida Statutes.1/Petitioner utilized the correct classification codes and manual rates in calculating workers' compensation penalty. Imputation of payroll was necessary where Respondent refused to provide requested business records.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer