Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Jaime Austrich
Jaime Austrich
Visitors: 59
0
Bar #84565(FL)     License for 28 years; Member in Good Standing
Tampa FL

Are you Jaime Austrich? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

2D14-6018  Zuppardo v. Dunlap and Moran, P.A.  (2016)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 12, 2016
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL ZUPPARDO, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-6018 ) DUNLAP AND MORAN, P.A., ) ) Appellees. ) _ ) Opinion filed February 12, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Charles E. Williams, Judge. Anthony S. Lefco, Sarasota, for Appellant. Maureen G. Pearcy of Hinshaw & Culbertson, LLP, Coral Gables, and Lori Heim of Hinshaw & Culbertson..
3D02-169  Travelers Ins. Co. v. Irby Const. Co., Inc.  (2002)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 22, 2002 Citations: 816 So. 2d 829
816 So. 2d 829 (2002) TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o Spiegel Meats, Inc., and Spiegel Meats, Inc., Appellants, v. IRBY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a foreign corporation, doing business in Florida, and Florida Power and Light Company, a Florida corporation doing business in Florida, Appellees. No. 3D02-169. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. May 22, 2002. Killgore, Pearlman, Stamp, Ornstein & Squires and Thomas H. Justice, III (Orlando) for appellants. O'Connor, Chimpoulis, Restan..
Bankruptcy No. 88-1346-BKC-3P7, Adv. No. 88-157  In Re Moore  (1989)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida Filed: Sep. 06, 1989 Citations: 104 B.R. 473
104 B.R. 473 (1989) In re Gerald D. MOORE and Carol J. Moore, Debtors. WATKINS UNLIMITED, INC., Plaintiff, v. Gerald D. MOORE and Carol J. Moore, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 88-1346-BKC-3P7, Adv. No. 88-157. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Jacksonville Division. September 6, 1989. Ronald Bergwerk, Jacksonville, Fla., for plaintiff. Julian Pinkston, Jacksonville, Fla., for defendants. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW GEORGE L. PROCTOR, Bankruptcy Judge. The trial in this advers..
11-1645-cv  ZBD Constructors, Inc. v. Billings Generation, Inc.  (2012)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Jul. 12, 2012
11-1645-cv ZBD Constructors, Inc. v. Billings Generation, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT’S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WI..
1D08-6019  Johnson v. State  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 08, 2009 Citations: 23 So. 3d 219
23 So. 3d 219 (2009) Samuel E. JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. No. 1D08-6019. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. December 8, 2009. Samuel E. Johnson, pro se, Petitioner. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent. *220 PER CURIAM. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel is denied on the merits. WOLF, KAHN, and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.
2D07-3458  Coverdale v. State  (2009)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jun. 19, 2009 Citations: 11 So. 3d 946
11 So. 3d 946 (2009) COVERDALE v. STATE. No. 2D07-3458. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. June 19, 2009. Decision without published opinion Affirmed.
96-005344  FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 1996
The issue in this case is whether Petitioner should be issued an air construction permit authorizing its Crystal River steam generating plant Units 1 and 2 to co-fire a five to seven percent blend of petroleum coke with coal.Where power units capable of burning petcoke prior to January 6, 1975, utility entitled to exemption from Prevention of Significant Deterioration review. Agency reversed.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer