Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Jay Olin Barber
Jay Olin Barber
Visitors: 62
1
Bar #223956(FL)     License for 49 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Jay Olin Barber? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

03-001949  ADAM B. DENECKE vs WORKFORCE FLORIDA, INC.  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2003
Petition should be dismissed for failure to plead a factual or legal basis for relief from the determination by the Commission on Human Relations that it lacks jurisdiction.
93-006564RX  MINI-WAREHOUSES AT KENDALL, LTD., D/B/A A+ MINI-STORAGE vs DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 16, 1993
The issue for determination at final hearing was whether the Florida Department of Transportation's Lease Agreement Form 225-080-03, OGC-0003, 7/92 constitutes an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.Form specifically referenced by existing rule and promulgated by rulemaking whereas unchallenged manual section was not. Dismissed.
93-004191BID  STIMSONITE CORPORATION vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 27, 1993
The issue in this case is whether, in making an award of a contract for reflective sheeting used in construction of highway signs, the Department of Management Services acted according to the requirements of law.Agency application of prior spec was altered without notice and was arbitrary.
91-004957  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs BLACK OLIVE NURSERY  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 1991
The issue for determination in this proceeding is whether the notice of violation issued by Petitioner for an unpermitted sign should be upheld and the sign removed.Notice of violation against nursery sign within 60 ft of ROW of fed.-aid primary hwy should be upheld.
91-004956  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs MARCENT FLORIDA, INC.  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 1991
The central issue in this case is whether the Respondent's sign located adjacent to I-4, 200 feet west of the centerline of State Road 482, in Orange County, Florida, violates Chapter 479, Florida Statutes, as alleged in the notice dated May 14, 1991; and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Sign within 500 feet of interchange and within 1500 feet of another permitted sign therefore violates law and not permittable.
91-004804  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs FRED OVERMYER  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 1991
Whether the signs referred to in Violation Notice Number 1-17-104 and 1-17- 105 dated February 5, 1991 are exempt from the permitting requirements of Chapter 479, Florida Statutes.Sufficient evidence to show signs were not permitted by DOT and were not exempt from permitting requirements
91-004799  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs LAURA UWANAWICH, D/B/A MRS. CLAIR  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 30, 1991
Whether a sign owned by Respondent and located on the northbound side of 27, at 853 U.S. 27 South, Lake Placid, Florida, is located in the road right-of-way, and must be removed.Petitioner must remove sign in Department of Transportation right o fway; no exemption permitted.
91-004953  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs KENNETH KOOZER  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 1991
The issue for determination is whether the Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board's decision in this matter is proper; a determination that necessarily requires a finding of whether Respondent is liable, in two separate instances, for payment of a civil penalty for commission of the infraction of interstate operation of a commercial motor vehicle without first obtaining a fuel use permit.Commercial Motor Vehicle Review Board decision was proper in view of Respon- dent's failure to obtain a fuel use permit.
91-004943  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs NORMAN WILLIAMS AND HAYES AND HAYES TRUCKING  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 1991
The issue in this case is whether the Hayes & Hayes Trucking triple axle dump truck being driven by Norman Williams on June 20, 1990, on U.S. 92 between 56th Street and Orient Road in Tampa, Florida, was being operated with its air axle up, resulting in its being over the maximum weight for its tandem rear axles, as well as for its steering axle, under Section 316.535, Florida Statutes (1989).Driving with air axle up, truck was over max for tandem rear axles, and front steering axle. Legal tolerance (10%) added to legal weight to get overweight
91-004946  DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION vs THURMOND INVESTMENT COMPANY AND CERTIFIED MOVERS, INC.  (1991)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 05, 1991
The issue in this case is whether, and to what extent, the Petitioner, the Department of Transportation (DOT), should penalize the Thurmond Investment Co. for the operation of a commercial motor vehicle it owns in excess of the maximum gross vehicle weight authorized by the declared weight of the vehicle, in violation of Section 316.545, Fla. Stat. (1989).DOT acquiesced to standing to request find be dropped. Commercial motor vehicle was operated over declared weight. No basis to modify fine

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer