welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Jennifer Leigh Blakeman
Jennifer Leigh Blakeman
Jennifer Leigh Blakeman
Visitors: 258
0
Bar #506877(FL)     License for 24 years
Orlando FL

Are you Jennifer Leigh Blakeman? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

CFR: 31 CFR 1010.311

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.57, 120.60, 120.68, 20.165, 20.60, 395.4001, 400.23, 455.225, 455.227, 455.2273, 455.228, 475.01, 475.25, 475.42, 475.611, 475.612, 475.615, 475.616, 475.617, 475.622, 475.6221, 475.6222, 475.623, 475.624, 475.626, 475.628, 475.629, 494.001, 494.0025, 494.00255, 560.103, 560.1105, 560.114, 560.1141, 560.123, 560.126, 560.309, 560.310, 560.402, 560.404, 57.111, 718.503, 775.082, 775.083, 775.084, 784.03, 784.08, 810.02, 90.606, 90.803

Florida Administrative Code: 61J2-14.008, 61J2-14.009, 61J2-14.010, 61J2-14.011, 61J2-24.001

4D15-1242  Daniel Cramer v. Bank of America, National Association  (2015)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Dec. 16, 2015
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DANIEL CRAMER, Appellant, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee. No. 4D15-1242 [December 16, 2015] Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Thomas M. Lynch, IV, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE09-37190 (02). Jerome R. Schechter of Jerome R. Schechter, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant. Kimberly N. Hopkins and Ronald M. Gaché of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché, LLP, Ta..
4D13-4741  Marvin Harris v. State of Florida  (2015)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: May 27, 2015
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MARVIN HARRIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D13-4741 [May 27, 2015] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Barry Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502011CF012984AXXXMB. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Richard B. Greene, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Cynthia L. Comras, Assistant Attorney Gen..
11-003008PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HUGH D. RHEA  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaints and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved that Respondent violated section 475.624(2) and (15). All other alleged volations not proven. Recommend revocation.
11-003009PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HUGH D. RHEA  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaints and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved that Respondent violated section 475.624(2) and (15). All other alleged volations not proven. Recommend revocation.
12-001220PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION vs CRAIG H. BUTTERFIELD  (2012)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 06, 2012
Whether Respondent violated section 475.624(15), Florida Statutes (2010), as alleged in the Administrative Complaint; and if so, the appropriate penalty.1/Department failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent did not use reasonable diligence in the preparation of an appraisal.
11-003007PL  DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, DIVISION OF REAL ESTATE vs HUGH D. RHEA  (2011)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 16, 2011
The issues to be determined are whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Amended Administrative Complaints and if so, what penalty should be imposed?The Department proved that Respondent violated section 475.624(2) and (15). All other alleged volations not proven. Recommend revocation.
16-000214  OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION vs MOCTEZUMA ENVIOS, INC., AND LILIANA CARRASCAL  (2016)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 14, 2016
Whether Respondents failed to maintain and deposit payment instruments into their own commercial account in a federally- insured financial institution, in violation of section 560.309(3), Florida Statutes (2013).1/Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Respondents did not maintain their own account at a federally insured financial institution. Recommend $4,250 fine.
15-002703  OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION vs FRANKIE DAMIANO  (2015)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 14, 2015
The issues in this matter are whether Respondent poses an immediate, serious danger to the public health, safety, or welfare, and, if so, whether Petitioner has cause to immediately suspend Respondent's loan originator license.Petitioner did not demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent's actions necessitated an emergency suspension of her loan originator's license.
14-004153  OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION vs MS MONEY, INC.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 08, 2014
Whether Respondent violated statutory and rule provisions relating to record-keeping requirements for licensed check cashers, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent did not comply with record-keeping requirements for check-cashing businesses.
14-002545  OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION vs GREENLAND FOOD MARKET, INC.  (2014)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 29, 2014
The primary issues in this case relate to whether Respondent, a licensed check cashing concern, failed to make and maintain various records documenting regulated financial transactions undertaken during a two-year audit period (2011- 2012), as Petitioner alleges. If Respondent is found guilty of any disciplinable offense(s), then it will be necessary to determine the appropriate penalties for such violation(s).Respondent, a licensed check cashing concern, failed to make and maintain various records documenting regulated financial transactions undertaken during a two-year audit period, warranting discipline.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer