welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  8. Jesús E. Cuza
Jesús E. Cuza
Jesús E. Cuza
Visitors: 35
0
Bar #428991(FL)     License for 24 years; Member in Good Standing
Fort Lauderdale FL

Are you Jesús E. Cuza? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

Related Laws :

Florida Laws: 120.569, 120.68, 509.092, 760.01, 760.02, 760.10, 760.11

07-1197  Life Receivables Trust v. SYNDICATE 102, LLOYD'S OF LONDON  (2008)
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: Nov. 25, 2008 Citations: 549 F.3d 210
549 F.3d 210 (2008) LIFE RECEIVABLES TRUST, Claimant, Life Settlements Corporation, doing business as Peachtree Life Settlements, Movant-Appellant, v. SYNDICATE 102 AT LLOYD'S OF LONDON, Respondent-Appellee. Docket No. 07-1197-cv. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: October 23, 2008. Decided: November 25, 2008. *211 Jesús E. Cuza, (Jeffrey B. Sklaroff, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, New York, NY, Elliot H. Scherker, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, FL, on the brief), Greenberg Traurig..
05-2859  OVERSEAS MILITARY SALES CORP. LTD. v. Giralt-Armada  (2007)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Sep. 14, 2007
Laws Ann. 386, or the losing party declines to pursue an appeal, Karcher v. May, 484 U.S. 72, 83, 108 S. Ct., So Ordered. Although he initiated the original claim against OMSC before DACO from which this case arises, Nieves took no further action before either the district court or this court.
04-2601  Puerto Rico Tele v. U.S. Phone  (2005)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Filed: Oct. 14, 2005 Citations: 427 F.3d 21
Under the proper review standard set forth in the FAA there were no grounds for vacating the award. 1801, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1270 (1967) (holding that notwithstanding a contrary state rule, consideration of a claim of fraud in the inducement of a contract is for the arbitrators and not for the courts);
17-000445  MONICA SCOPEL vs EVENTS BY PREMIER  (2017)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 19, 2017
Whether Respondent committed the unlawful employment practice alleged by Petitioner in her Employment Charge of Discrimination filed with the Florida Commission on Human Relations ("FCHR") on May 3, 2016; and, if so, what relief should Petitioner be granted.Petitioner did not prove that Respondent discriminated against her due to her "marital status" under the FCRA. Respondent had legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons to terminate her employment.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer