Leon FL Lawyers | Joe Thompson -- eLawyers

Joe Thompson

Visitors: 124

Bar #686328(FL) License for 22 years; Member in Good Standing

Tallahassee FL

Are you Joe Thompson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

92-6429 (1993)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Aug. 04, 1993 Citations: 996 F.2d 1155

996 F.2d 1155 62 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 769 , 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 42,642 Delphine Edwards GOLDSMITH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF ATMORE; Howard Shell, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of City of Atmore, Alabama, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-6429. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 4, 1993. Joe Thompson, Brewton, AL, Susan Williams Reeves, Birmingham, AL, for defendants-appellants. Ronnie L. Williams, Mobile, AL, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from ..

04-003366 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs ST. JAMES AUTOMOTIVE, INC. (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Sep. 21, 2004

The issues in this enforcement proceeding are whether Respondent failed to comply with Sections 440.10, 440.05, and , Florida Statutes (2003),1 and, if so, whether Petitioner correctly assessed the penalty for said failure.Respondent failed to file for an exemption and to collect and pay workers` compensation. Recommend assessed $97,260.75 fine and a stop work order amended to include the agreed payment of the fine by installment.

16-000524 JONATHAN BLEIWEISS vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT (2016)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 29, 2016

The issue in this proceeding is whether Petitioner was convicted of specified criminal offenses, requiring the forfeiture of all of his rights and benefits under the Florida Retirement System, except for the return of accumulated contributions.Petitioner was not convicted of specified criminal offenses requiring the forfeiture of all his rights and benefits under the Florida Retirement System.

15-001528 VIVIAN RENAUD vs DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES, DIVISION OF RETIREMENT (2015)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 18, 2015

The issue in this case is whether Petitioner’s husband’s selection of Option 1 for his pension plan benefits could be changed.Petitioner did not meet burden of proving entitlement to deceased husband's retirement benefits.

04-002524 TRIPLE M ENTERPRISES, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jul. 19, 2004

The issue is whether Petitioner, Triple M Enterprises, Inc., employed persons in the State of Florida without obtaining workers' compensation insurance meeting the requirements of Chapter 440, Florida Statutes. If Petitioner did not obtain the required insurance, the subsequent issue is the amount of any penalty.Petitioner failed to obtain workers` compensation coverage for its employees which met the requirements of Chapter 440, Florida Statutes. Respondent properly issued the stop-work order. Recommend that Petitioner pay a penalty of $36,521.61.

04-003789 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs MACS CONSTRUCTION AND CONCRETE, INC. (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 15, 2004

Whether Respondent owes $1,568,399.00 or $2,323,765.60 as a penalty for failing to secure workers' compensation insurance for its employees, as required by Florida law.Petitioner correctly calculated the penalty Respondent had to pay for failing to obtain workers` compensation insurance for its employees.

04-001174 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs HERNANDEZ ENTERPRISES (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 07, 2004

The issue is whether Respondent complied with Sections and 440.38, Florida Statutes, with regard to workers' compensation insurance for his subcontractors, and if not, the appropriate amount of penalty that should be assessed.Petitioner filed a Stop Work Order on the theory that employess of two subcontractors were Respondent`s employees. The subcontractors showed workers` compensation insurance. Recommend that the Order be lifted, no penalties assessed, and the money repaid.

04-003838PL DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES vs MICHAEL DAVID GARRETT (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Oct. 27, 2004

Whether the licensure and eligibility for licensure as an insurance agent in Florida held by Respondent Michael David Garrett should be disciplined based on the allegations of the Administrative Complaint filed against him and, if so, the extent of such discipline.Respondent violated the Insurance Code by accepting $23,920.77 for health insurance and not securing the insurance for the applicants.

04-003041 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs U AND M CONTRACTORS, INC. (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 27, 2004

Did Respondent fail to comply with Sections 440.10 and 440.38, Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.The Stop Work Order and penalty for using non-Florida premiums was upheld based on "producer" of the workers` compensation policy.

04-002264 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION vs MIKE FUTCH, D/B/A FUTCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (2004)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 29, 2004

Whether Mike Futch, d/b/a Futch Construction Company, (Respondent) violated Sections 440.10 and 440.38, Florida Statutes, and if so, what penalty should be imposed. References to sections are to the Florida Statutes (2004).Respondent`s reliance on his insurance agent to secure workers` compensation insurance which fullfills the requirement of Florida law does not constitute a defense of failure to provide coverage required by law. Recommend penalty of $198,311.82 be upheld.