Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
John Michael Carlson
John Michael Carlson
Visitors: 62
0
Bar #167671(FL)    
Keystone Heights FL

Are you John Michael Carlson? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

88-000908GM  DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS vs. MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  (1988)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 09, 1989
At issue in this proceeding is whether Monroe County's construction of a road on Big Pine Key, Monroe County, Florida, is contrary to the provisions of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. At hearing, petitioner called as witnesses: William Becker; Kurtis Kruer; Thomas Wilmers, accepted as an expert in wildlife management and wildlife biology, specializing in the Key Deer; George Garrett; Deborah Holle, accepted as an expert in wildlife management and wildlife biology, specializing in the Key Deer; Maria Abadal, accepted as an expert planner, with emphasis on the administration of the Florida Area of Critical State Concern program; and William Tipton, accepted as an expert in transportation planning and transportation engineering. Petitioner's exhibits 1-7, 8a-8i, 9-12, 13a-13c, 14 and 15 were received into evidence. Respondent called as witnesses: Robert Harris, accepted as an expert in land surveying and road maintenance; Eugene Lytton, Sr.; Charles Pierce; John Chaffee; Andrew Earl Hanson; David Giggs; and William Becker. Respondent's exhibits 1-8 were received into evidence.County's construction materially altered use and appearance of road and therefore not maintenance-act thus contrary to land use plan for lack of permit.
84-002631CON  TALLAHASSEE MEMORIAL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1984)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: May 17, 1985
Whether HRS should license 23 comprehensive rehabilitation beds to TMRMC, at the same time reducing general acute care beds licensed at TMRMC by 23? Whether, prior to midnight June 30, 1983, TMRMC had 23 comprehensive rehabilitation beds in service?Hospital's claim that it had rehabilitation unit when Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (DHRS) rule adopted requiring Certificate of Need (CON) to build new unit is unsupported; CON needed to build unit.
83-000816  FEDERAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION vs. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES  (1983)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Latest Update: Nov. 30, 1984
New rule should be applied to a pending Certificate of Need (CON) application.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer