Leon FL Administrative law, Estate planning and Real estate -- eLawyers

92-2054 United States v. Martin Carl Norman, A/K/A Marty Norman, James Andrew Sanders, John Jacob Wells, United States of America v. John Jacob Wells (1993)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Sep. 30, 1993 Citations: 3 F.3d 368

3 F.3d 368 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Martin Carl NORMAN, a/k/a Marty Norman, James Andrew Sanders, John Jacob Wells, Defendants-Appellants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Jacob WELLS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-3088, 92-2054. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Sept. 30, 1993. L. William Porter, II, Tallahassee, FL, for Martin C. Norman. John O. Williams, Tallahassee, FL, for James Andrew Sanders. Steven H. Sadow, Atlanta, GA, for John..

87-5388 (1987)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Filed: Dec. 31, 1987 Citations: 838 F.2d 462

838 F.2d 462 Newton (Martin L.) v. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Carlson (Norman), Petrovsky (J.) Wilkinson (G.C.), Hillwig (Ronald), Hill (Furman), Mahoney (John, M.D.), O'Connor (John), Chadwick (William), Pannell (John), Noone (Randy), Sullivan (J.), Haugh (C.), Madigan (Larry) NO. 87-5388 United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. DEC 31, 1987 Appeal From: M.D.Pa., Conaboy, J. 1 AFFIRMED.

86-3534 United States v. Ira Lee Watkins, Larry Watkins, Eugene Jones (1987)

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: Mar. 06, 1987 Citations: 811 F.2d 1408

811 F.2d 1408 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ira Lee WATKINS, Larry Watkins, Eugene Jones, Defendants-Appellants. No. 86-3534 Non-Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. March 6, 1987. Herbert R. Kraft, Tallahassee, Fla., for I.L. Watkins. John O. Williams, Tallahassee, Fla., for L. Watkins. Clifford Davis, Tallahassee, Fla., for Jones. Paul Alan Sprowls, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tallahassee, Fla., for U.S. Appeals from the United States District Court for ..

92-03794 Shaw v. State (1994)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Mar. 16, 1994 Citations: 637 So. 2d 254

637 So. 2d 254 (1994) George Eric SHAW, a/k/a Eric Simms, a/k/a Jose C. Lemus, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 92-03794. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. March 16, 1994. Rehearing Denied April 27, 1994. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Cynthia J. Dodge, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant. *255 Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee. PER CURIAM. The appellant, George Eric Sha..

14-001291RU CAPITAL CITY CHECK CASHING vs OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (2014)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 18, 2014

Whether Respondent, Office of Financial Regulation, has made certain agency statements with regard to record-keeping requirements for licensed check cashers, which are agency rules as defined in section 120.52(16), Florida Statutes, but have not been adopted as rules in violation of section 120.54(1)(a), Florida Statutes; and if so, whether costs and attorney’s fees should be awarded.Petitioner did not demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the agency's alleged statements were rules as defined by section 120.52(16), and not adopted as such according to section 120.54.

13-004484 OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION vs CAPITAL CITY CHECK CASHING (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 20, 2013

Whether Respondent violated statutory and rule provisions relating to record-keeping requirements for licensed check cashers, and if so, what penalty should be imposed.Petitioner proved by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent did not comply with record-keeping requirements for check-cashing businesses during the examination period.

13-004739RX CAPITAL CITY CHECK CASHING vs OFFICE OF FINANCIAL REGULATION (2013)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 10, 2013

Whether part of Florida Administrative Code Rule 69V- 560.704, particularly subsections (4)(d) and (5)(a), exceed Respondent’s rulemaking authority; enlarge, modify or contravene the specific provisions of law implemented; or are arbitrary or capricious, and thus, constitute an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority pursuant to section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.Petitioner did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that sections of Florida Administrative Code Rule 69V-560.704 were an invalid exercise of Respondent's delegated legislative authority pursuant to section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes.

97-005193 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKERS vs MARTIN LUDWIG (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 05, 1997

Whether Respondent committed the violations alleged in the Administrative Complaint, as amended, and, if so, what penalties should be imposed.Licensed clinical social worker who engaged in sexual activities with a patient is guilty of "sexual misconduct."

97-005887 BOARD OF MASSAGE vs 339 HEALTH STUDIO, INC. (1997)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 15, 1997

At issue in this proceeding is whether Respondent committed the offense set forth in the Administrative Complaint, and, if so, what penalty should be imposed.Proof failed to support conclusion that person giving massage was licensed employee, thus recommended dismissal.

98-000363 BOARD OF NURSING HOME ADMINISTRATORS vs JUDITH ORTIZ (1998)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jan. 15, 1998

The issue for consideration in this case is whether Respondent’s license as a nursing home administrator in Florida should be disciplined because of the matters alleged in the Administrative Complaint filed herein.Administrator`s failure to ensure proper care plans were developed and implemented in nursing home where she was administrator constituted negligence and incompetence, but not enough evidence to support revocation of license.

John O. Williams