Leon FL Administrative law, Government contracts and Privacy -- eLawyers

Ago (1975)

Florida Attorney General Reports Filed: Sep. 09, 1975

QUESTIONS: 1. May the posting of a copy of a marriage license application pursuant to s. 741.04 , F.S. (1974 Supp.), be at the front door of the branch office in a county which has authorized a branch circuit court clerk's office 2. May the circuit court clerk assess a fee for verification pursuant to s. 28.24 (3), F.S., when he certifies a photocopy of an instrument SUMMARY: The posting of a copy of a marriage license application pursuant to s. 741.04 , F.S. (1974 Supp.), must be at the front ..

2D14-3121 Latham v. State (2016)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 10, 2016

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT KRYSTLE LATHAM, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-3121 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 10, 2016. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; William R. Webb, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard J. Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee,..

2D12-77 Welch v. State (2012)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 27, 2012 Citations: 80 So. 3d 1035

80 So. 3d 1035 (2012) WELCH v. STATE. No. 2D12-77. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 27, 2012. DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION Mandamus dismissed.

19-000643 AARON JAY GOODRUM, M.D. vs AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION (2019)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Feb. 05, 2019

The issues in this matter are whether Petitioner has shown that he is rehabilitated from his disqualifying offense; and, if so, whether a decision by the Agency for Health Care Administration to deny Petitioner’s request for an exemption from disqualification for Medicaid provider enrollment would constitute an abuse of discretion.Petitioner proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that he is rehabilitated from his disqualifying offense. Further, denial of his request for exemption would constitute an abuse of discretion. Recommend approval of exemption request.

06-002094PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ARNALDO CARMOUZE, P.A. (2006)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Jun. 15, 2006

The issue in this case is whether Respondent, Arnaldo Carmouze, P.A., committed violations of Chapter 458, Florida Statutes (2001), alleged in an Administrative Complaint filed with Petitioner on February 25, 2004, in DOH Case Number 2002- 16502, as amended; and, if so, what disciplinary action should be taken against his license to practice as a physician assistant in Florida.Respondent failed to include his mane and title (physician`s assistant) and his supervising physician`s name and title in the medical records. He also practiced without direct or indirect supervision.

18-004558PL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE vs ORLY PENA-SANCHEZ, M.D. (2018)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 30, 2018

The issues in this case are whether Respondent engaged in sexual misconduct in the practice of medicine, in violation of section 458.331(1)(j), Florida Statutes; and, if so, what is the appropriate sanction.Petitioner failed to prove sexual activity within a patient-physician relationship, by clear and convincing evidence, where the alleged victim was the only direct witness and her varied accounts of what happened differed in numerous details.

17-003025RP FLORIDA SOCIETY OF AMBULATORY SURGICAL CENTERS, INC.; HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A OAK HILL HOSPITAL; HSS SYSTEMS, LLC, D/B/A PARALLON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE GROUP; AND AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2017

The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.

17-003026RP HCA HEALTH SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC., D/B/A OAK HILL HOSPITAL AND HSS SYSTEMS, LLC, D/B/A PARALLON BUSINESS PERFORMANCE GROUP vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 22, 2017

The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.

17-003027RP AUTOMATED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, INC. vs DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION (2017)

Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 23, 2017

The issues to be determined are: whether Petitioners have standing; whether the petition of Automated HealthCare Solutions, Inc. (AHCS), was timely filed1/; and whether Respondent’s proposed rules 69L-31.005(2)(d), 69L-31.016(1), and 69L-31.016(2) are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority on the grounds raised by Petitioners.Proposed rule 69L-31.016(1) & (2), and related filing change, are invalid. Resp. must determine if carriers properly disallowed or adjusted payment to providers in reimbursement disputes; no authority to create exceptions for certain disputes.

95-02671 Pearson v. State (1997)

District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Jan. 03, 1997 Citations: 686 So. 2d 721

686 So. 2d 721 (1997) Nadine PEARSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 95-02671. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District. January 3, 1997. James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Michael J.P. Baker, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Erica M. Raffel, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. WHATLEY, Judge. Nadine Pearson appeals her sentence for two counts of driving under the influence w..

Julie Gallagher