welcome to elawyers.us
Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
  1. Home
  2. Find a Lawyer
  6. Justin George Wolfe
Justin George Wolfe
Justin George Wolfe
Visitors: 47
0
Bar #641601(FL)     License for 21 years
Tallahassee FL

Are you Justin George Wolfe? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

08-003886  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003887  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003888  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
08-003889  LEE COUNTY vs MOSAIC FERTILIZER, LLC AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2008)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 08, 2008
The issues are whether Respondent, Mosaic Fertilizer, LLC (Mosaic), has provided reasonable assurances that the proposed mining and reclamation of the South Fort Meade Mine in Hardee County can be conducted in a manner that comports with the applicable statutes and rules such that the proposed Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Conceptual Reclamation Plan (CRP), variance from minimum standards for dissolved oxygen, and variance from littoral zone percentage provisions for the Project should be issued by Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (Department).Applications for ERP, CRP, and two variances approved where Mosiac gave reasonable assurances that all relevant statutes and rules were satisfied.
03-000791  PEACE RIVER/MANASOTA REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY AUTHORITY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000792  CHARLOTTE COUNTY vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 04, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000804  ALAN R. BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-000805  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC. vs IMC PHOSPHATES COMPANY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 06, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
03-001610  DESOTO CITIZENS AGAINST POLLUTION, INC., AND ALAN BEHRENS vs IMC PHOSPHATES, INC., AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2003)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 2003
The issues are whether IMC Phosphates Company is entitled to an environmental resource permit for phosphate mining and reclamation on the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, approval of its conceptual reclamation plan for the Ona-Ft. Green extension tract, and modification of its existing wetland resource permit for the Ft. Green Mine to reconfigure clay settling areas, relocate mitigation wetlands, and extend the reclamation schedule.The various specific conditions to the environmental resource permit are developed after the remand.
05-002979  TROY AND TRACEY LEE vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND PALM BEACH COUNTY WATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT  (2005)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Aug. 18, 2005
The issue is whether Palm Beach County's application for a permit to construct a domestic wastewater collection/transmission system in Palm Beach County should be approved.Palm Beach County`s application for a domestic wastewater collection/transmission system to serve the Scripps Project is approved; the pipe material used met technical specifications.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer