Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change
Keith Hetrick
Keith Hetrick
Visitors: 42
0
Bar #564168(FL)     License for 38 years; Member in Good Standing
Tallahassee FL

Are you Keith Hetrick? Claim this page now or Cliam yourself lawyer page

  The Fidelity Cas. Co. v. Long  (1927)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Aug. 01, 1927 Citations: 114 So. 249, 94 Fla. 547
In this case demurrer was sustained to an amended declaration and, the plaintiff declining to plead further, order of court was entered dismissing the cause, to which order writ of error was taken. The declaration attempts to allege a cause of action based upon promissory notes and a contract executed by a married woman in the State of Florida, which notes and contract were so executed by her in consideration of the extinguishment of certain obligations which she executed in the State of New York..
19-006137RP  OFFICE OF PUBLIC COUNSEL vs FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION  (2019)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Nov. 15, 2019
I. Whether the Office of Public Counsel (Petitioner or the Public Counsel) and Florida Industrial Power Users Group (Florida Industrial) have standing. II. Whether proposed rules 25-6.030(3)(d), 25-6.030(3)(e), 25-6.030(3)(j), 25-6.031(6), and 25-6.031(7)(c), proposed by the Florida Public Service Commission (Respondent or the Commission), are valid exercises of delegated legislative authority.Petitioner and Intervenor had standing to challenge the proposed rules, but the evidence showed that the proposed rules are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.
SC08-147  In Re Amendments to Rules of Appellate Procedure  (2008)
Supreme Court of Florida Filed: Nov. 13, 2008 Citations: 2 So. 3d 89
2 So. 3d 89 (2008) In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE. No. SC08-147. Supreme Court of Florida. November 13, 2008. Rehearing Denied January 30, 2009. John S. Mills, Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Jacksonville, FL; Steven L. Brannock, Past Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Holland and Knight, Tampa, FL; John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, and Krys Godwin, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, and David Miller of Broad and Cassel, Tallahassee, FL, for Pe..
5D00-679  Paszamant v. Retirement Accounts, Inc.  (2001)
District Court of Appeal of Florida Filed: Feb. 02, 2001 Citations: 776 So. 2d 1049
776 So. 2d 1049 (2001) Joan PASZAMANT, etc., et al., Appellant, v. RETIREMENT ACCOUNTS, INC., etc., Appellee. No. 5D00-679. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 2, 2001. *1050 William G. Osborne of William G. Osborne, P.A., Orlando and Barry N. Greenberg of Mishan, Sloto, Greenberg, Hellinger & Udolf, P.A., Miami, for Appellant. Anthony Deglomine, III and Nichole M. Mooney of Dean, Mead, Egerton, Bloodworth, Capouano & Bozarth, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. Th..
04-000880RP  ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (2004)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 2004
The issue for determination in this case is whether proposed rules 62-40.410(3) and 62-40.474, in whole or in part, are invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority within the meaning of Section 120.52(8), Florida Statutes (2005).1The proposed rules are not invalid exercises of delegated legislative authority.
96-006138GM  ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF BROWARD COUNTY, INC. vs BROWARD COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (NO. 068732762)  (1996)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Dec. 31, 1996
The issue in these cases is whether amendments to the Broward County Comprehensive Plan are "in compliance" as defined in Section 163.3184(1), Florida Statutes.Petitioners proved plan amendment to require public schools concurrency was not in compliance.
92-001604  PASCO COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS vs DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 10, 1992
The issues in this case are: Case No. 92-1604: Whether the Department should grant the County's amended application for a permit (application no. DC51-189086) to construct a sprayfield reuse disposal system at .215 MGD and a rapid rate infiltration basin reuse (percolation pond) disposal system at .185 MGD at Moon Lake Road. Case No. 92-1653: Whether the Department should grant the County's amended application for a permit (application no. DO51-194674) to operate its Wesley Chapel Wastewater Treatment Plant at .600 MGD and to operate its Oakley Grove rapid rate infiltration basin reuse (percolation pond) disposal system at 0.600 MGD. Case No. 92-1654: Whether the Department should grant the County's application for a permit (application no. DO51-199516) to reactivate the operation of its Ryals Road rapid rate infiltration basin reuse (percolation pond) disposal system at .1075 MGD.Seepage from percolation ponds to perimeter ditches required surface water permit and WQBELS. Prior noncompliance relevant even without Notice Of Violation. No estoppel. No default.
92-002488  MARIE COOK MATIS vs PASCO COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1992)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Apr. 24, 1992
Whether Pasco County should be granted operating permits for Embassy Hills Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) (Case 92-2489); Hudson WWTP (Case 92-2489); Hudson WWTP (Case 92-2488); and 8 Rapid Rate Infiltration Basins (RRIB) in Northwest Pasco County (Case 93-3091); whether the permit for RRIB should be granted to construct 10 RRIBs rather than 8 (Case 93-3641); whether these facilities can be operated without damage to the area potable and ground water systems; and whether the operating permit should include the provisions of a settlement agreement entered into between Matis, Pasco County and DER dated December 7, 1987. Whether the challenge to these permits was timely filed by Petitioner was resolved prior to the hearing and will not be revisited.Application provided reasonable assurances that waste water treatment plants and rapid rate infilitration basin will not cause pollution. Terms of settlement agreement between parties in prior case not proper to include permits
93-001499  HELEN C. SUTTON vs TANA HUBBARD AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: Mar. 15, 1993
The issues for determination in this proceeding are whether Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection (the "Department"), should issue a permit for an existing retaining wall and dock located at the residence of Respondent, Tana Hubbard ("Hubbard"), in waters of the state; and whether the Department should issue an after-the-fact consent of use for the dock.Single family dock in waters of the State and sovereign submerged lands is entitled to dredge and fill permit and consent of use.
93-005724  HAROLD AND CHARLOTTE TOMS vs SPRINGS ON KINGS BAY AND DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  (1993)
Division of Administrative Hearings, Florida Filed: May 24, 1994
Whether the Respondent, Springs on Kings Bay, is entitled to a dredge and fill permit from the Respondent, Department of Environmental Protection.Petitioners failed to prove dredge and fill permit should not be issued for boat slips on Crystal River. Petitioners also lacked standing.

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer